1945
DOI: 10.3171/jns.1945.2.3.0245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arnold-Chiari Deformity in an Adult Without Obvious Cause

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1951
1951
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also many publications (1,5,15,22,26,35,45,57,59) claiming Arnold-Chiari deformities without the presence of occipital bone and spine abnormalities, are in fact not proven Arnold-Chiari, but possible Chiari type I deformities. Only PEACH'S recent publication is probably the first proven Arnold-Chiari deformity without spinal dysraphism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also many publications (1,5,15,22,26,35,45,57,59) claiming Arnold-Chiari deformities without the presence of occipital bone and spine abnormalities, are in fact not proven Arnold-Chiari, but possible Chiari type I deformities. Only PEACH'S recent publication is probably the first proven Arnold-Chiari deformity without spinal dysraphism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cerebellar herniation through the foramen magnum may be found in patients with or without craniovertebral anomalies and meningomyeloceles. In association with craniovertebral abnormalities in adult patients it has been observed by Chamberlain (1939), Gustafson and Oldberg (1940), List (1941), Craig, Walsh, and Camp (1942), Scoville and Sherman (1951) Garcin and Oeconomos (1953), Cogan and Barrows (1954), and by others. With a normal craniovertebral junction it has been reported by Aring (1938), McConnell and Parker (1938), Ogryzlo ( 1942), Bucy and Lichtenstein (1945), Gardner and Goodall (1950), and by others.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The use of SSEP and BAER as a real-time, intraoperative surrogate for surgical outcome or extent of decompression in Chiari type I malformation has been proposed, but not proven. The purpose of suboccipital craniectomy itself remains debatable, with various authors asserting relief of direct compression on neural structures,[1346152328] improvements in CSF flow,[3101522232528] decompression of vascular structures,[23] and/or creation of a cisterna magna,[1517] as principal objectives of the procedure. However, our study and others have shown that the neurophysiological parameters consistently improve following decompression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%