2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aromatase inhibitor use, side-effects and discontinuation rates in gynecologic oncology patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among patients who switched to a different AI due to adverse effects in this study, only 38% of patients were able to tolerate a second AI for a median of 13 months. Within the gynecologic oncology literature, one retrospective study found similar rates of AIMSS symptoms in women on AI therapy at equivalent doses for primarily advanced stage ovarian or uterine cancer, though only 5.0% of patients discontinued AI therapy due adverse effects ( 38 ). The authors of this study hypothesized that the gynecologic oncology sample was more likely to continue AI therapy since their sample population had more advanced disease on average than in breast cancer adjuvant therapy studies, however data is comparatively limited in the gynecologic oncology setting.…”
Section: Prevalence and Associated Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among patients who switched to a different AI due to adverse effects in this study, only 38% of patients were able to tolerate a second AI for a median of 13 months. Within the gynecologic oncology literature, one retrospective study found similar rates of AIMSS symptoms in women on AI therapy at equivalent doses for primarily advanced stage ovarian or uterine cancer, though only 5.0% of patients discontinued AI therapy due adverse effects ( 38 ). The authors of this study hypothesized that the gynecologic oncology sample was more likely to continue AI therapy since their sample population had more advanced disease on average than in breast cancer adjuvant therapy studies, however data is comparatively limited in the gynecologic oncology setting.…”
Section: Prevalence and Associated Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%