1991
DOI: 10.1021/ja00011a050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aromatic hole superexchange through position 82 of cytochrome c is not required for intracomplex electron transfer to zinc cytochrome c peroxidase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
49
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ET kinetics and relative reactivity of all four Cc Phe-82 mutants (Table 1) agree remarkably well with previous solution studies of the same variants (12). Thus, the crystal associations likely represent the 1:1 complexes formed in solution.…”
Section: Structures and Redox Properties Of Znccp In Complex With Yccsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The ET kinetics and relative reactivity of all four Cc Phe-82 mutants (Table 1) agree remarkably well with previous solution studies of the same variants (12). Thus, the crystal associations likely represent the 1:1 complexes formed in solution.…”
Section: Structures and Redox Properties Of Znccp In Complex With Yccsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…As seen in solution studies of these systems (12), all of the mutant complexes have a variable slow phase (k eb 2 ϭ 30-70 s Ϫ1 , f 2 ϭ 0.08-0.22) associated with the back ET process (Table 1). This slow phase could reflect direct Fe(II) to Zn-porphyrin ϩ ET, as seen in the CcP W191F mutant (18); however, short-circuit through Trp-191 ϩ should greatly limit porphyrin-porphyrin ET, provided the porphyrin and indolyl radicals rapidly interconvert relative to the interfacial ET reaction.…”
Section: Structures and Redox Properties Of Znccp In Complex With Yccmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite significant advances in our understanding of long-range electron transfer in biological systems (McLendon, 1988;Gray & Malmstrom, 1989), many factors controlling protein-protein electron transfer remain ill defined. Although recent attention has focused upon the role of the protein-protein interface in the attenuation of electron transfer rates (Peery & KostiE, 1989;Hazzard et al, 1989;Everest et al, 1991;Nocek et al, 1991), no detailed structural information is available concerning the exact interfacial contacts between this or any other pair of electron transfer proteins. The involvement of charged residues in the specificity and stabilization of electrostatic complexes between a variety of electron transfer proteins is well documented (KostiS, 1991), though little is known about the pH dependence of these reactions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%