2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13391-016-6002-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aromatic substituents for prohibiting side-chain packing and π-π stacking in tin-cored tetrahedral stilbenoids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1G and H, there is a strong hydrogen bonding effect and π–π stacking interaction when the PHAzoMA 59 homopolymer self-assembles into nanobowls. The shift of the absorption peak of –OH to a lower wavenumber (from 3406 to 3347 cm –1 ) along with the expanding and strengthening of –OH absorbance in the FT-IR spectrum after self-assembly indicates the formation of hydrogen bonds,32 while the red shift of the absorption peak of the azobenzene group (from 397 to 471 nm) in the UV-vis spectrum confirms the existence of π–π stacking interaction 44. The detailed influence of the non-covalent interactions on the formation of nanobowls will be discussed later in this paper.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…1G and H, there is a strong hydrogen bonding effect and π–π stacking interaction when the PHAzoMA 59 homopolymer self-assembles into nanobowls. The shift of the absorption peak of –OH to a lower wavenumber (from 3406 to 3347 cm –1 ) along with the expanding and strengthening of –OH absorbance in the FT-IR spectrum after self-assembly indicates the formation of hydrogen bonds,32 while the red shift of the absorption peak of the azobenzene group (from 397 to 471 nm) in the UV-vis spectrum confirms the existence of π–π stacking interaction 44. The detailed influence of the non-covalent interactions on the formation of nanobowls will be discussed later in this paper.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Figure shows the changes in the work function for (a) MoS 2 and (b) WS 2 depending on the material size. The onset of the secondary electron was determined by extrapolating the two solid lines from the background and the straight onset in the spectra . The work function of bulk MoS 2 was measured to be 4.6 eV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The onset of the secondary electron was determined by extrapolating the two solid lines from the background and the straight onset in the spectra. 56 The work function of bulk MoS 2 was measured to be 4.6 eV. After exfoliation into nanosheets and nanodots, the work function of MoS 2 remains 4.6 eV.…”
Section: ■ Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%