“…This concept not only proved to be useful for hydrocarbons in their electronic ground states but also has been vastly used to interpret characteristics of metallaaromatics , and metallic clusters − as well as hydrocarbons in their excited electronic states. , However, because aromaticity does not have a quantum mechanical operator, qualitative and quantitative assessment of aromaticity proved to be a controversial task. Aromaticity criteria, i.e., energetic, structural, electronic, and magnetic, , sometimes conflict with one another. − Even within a particular criterion of aromaticity, sometimes different tools show contradictory results or at least results that are open for discussion. − Even the validity of the Hückel rule and the role of active orbitals in the magnetic response of the aromatic species has been questioned recently . In a recent perspective article, my colleagues and I collected opinions of several experts in the field of aromaticity, hoping to reach an agreement on the topic .…”