2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00020-014-2143-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Around the Van Daele–Schmüdgen Theorem

Abstract: Abstract. For a bounded non-negative self-adjoint operator acting in a complex, infinitedimensional, separable Hilbert space H and possessing a dense range R we propose a new approach to characterisation of phenomenon concerning the existence of subspaces [36] to refine them. We also develop a new systematic approach, which allows to construct for any unbounded densely defined symmetric/self-adjoint operator T infinitely many pairs T 1 , T 2 of its closed densely defined restrictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result by Schmüdgen (which was generalized later by Brasche and Neidhardt in [2]; see also [1]) is great but remains fairly theoretical. There seems to be no other simple Chernoff-like (whatever simplicity means) example around in the literature except the one by Chernoff.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This result by Schmüdgen (which was generalized later by Brasche and Neidhardt in [2]; see also [1]) is great but remains fairly theoretical. There seems to be no other simple Chernoff-like (whatever simplicity means) example around in the literature except the one by Chernoff.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Remark 5.7. Several recent results on operator ranges in [AZ15] can immediately be extended to the nonseparable case provided the corresponding operator range satisfies Condition (ii) in Theorem 4.6. In particular, this applies for example to [AZ15, Theorems 3.7, 3.12 and 3.19].…”
Section: Stability and Densitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Because ran Z 0 = M, ker Z 0 = {0} and ker(I − Z 2 0 ) = {0} we can apply Proposition 4.1 (see statement (5)). So, ran T 2 0 ∩ ran T * 2 0 = {0}.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%