Oxford Music Online 2001
DOI: 10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.01332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arrangement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, if LIS schemes could allow for them, not only would this create a more perfected faceted structure of music, it would also allow for any future permutations of musical medium. The LIS classifications of arrangements reflect the music domain's reflections about the dominance of instrumental-to-instrumental arrangements from the Baroque era onwards (Boyd, 2001), as also codified in the music domain proto-taxonomy of arrangements by Keller (1969) A similar situation arises for the broad categorization of size, where sometimes the accompaniment of groups is treated differently from the accompaniment of ensembles; furthermore, some broad size foci are not permitted to be the accompanied or accompaniment, such as there being no way of a work for orchestra being accompanied by piano in schemes such as BCMC or Flexible. Therefore, a model of LIS classification would benefit from accompaniment and arrangement sub-facets which are entirely free from both vocal/instrumental and broad size categorizations, for the purposes of a truer faceted structure and being open to works of any musical medium, however fanciful.…”
Section: Impact Of Vocal/instrumental Categorization On Accompanimentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, if LIS schemes could allow for them, not only would this create a more perfected faceted structure of music, it would also allow for any future permutations of musical medium. The LIS classifications of arrangements reflect the music domain's reflections about the dominance of instrumental-to-instrumental arrangements from the Baroque era onwards (Boyd, 2001), as also codified in the music domain proto-taxonomy of arrangements by Keller (1969) A similar situation arises for the broad categorization of size, where sometimes the accompaniment of groups is treated differently from the accompaniment of ensembles; furthermore, some broad size foci are not permitted to be the accompanied or accompaniment, such as there being no way of a work for orchestra being accompanied by piano in schemes such as BCMC or Flexible. Therefore, a model of LIS classification would benefit from accompaniment and arrangement sub-facets which are entirely free from both vocal/instrumental and broad size categorizations, for the purposes of a truer faceted structure and being open to works of any musical medium, however fanciful.…”
Section: Impact Of Vocal/instrumental Categorization On Accompanimentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, if LIS schemes could allow for them, not only would this create a more perfected faceted structure of music, it would also allow for any future permutations of musical medium. The LIS classifications of arrangements reflect the music domain’s dominance of instrumental-to-instrumental arrangements from the Baroque era onwards (Boyd, 2001), as also codified in the music domain proto-taxonomy of arrangements by Keller (1969) which gives primarily instrumental examples. However, vocal arrangements exist, as do (occasionally) arrangements between vocal and instrumental music (and vice versa), and a more idealistic and open structure of medium classification would also allow for such possibilities.…”
Section: Arrangement and Accompanimentmentioning
confidence: 99%