2014
DOI: 10.1002/2014gl062126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Array analysis of electromagnetic radiation from radio transmitters for submarine communication

Abstract: International audienceThe array analyses used for seismic and infrasound research are adapted and applied here to the electromagnetic radiation from radio transmitters for submarine communication. It is found that the array analysis enables a determination of the slowness and the arrival azimuth of the wave number vectors associated with the electromagnetic radiation. The array analysis is applied to measurements of ∼20–24 kHz radio waves from transmitters for submarine communication with an array of 10 radio … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

8
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each receiver is a wideband vertical electric field sensor that samples every 1 μs, with an amplitude resolution of ∼35 μV/m and timing accuracy of ∼20 ns (Füllekrug, ). The accuracy of the array measurements has been shown to be close to instrumental limits (Füllekrug et al, , section 6). The time of the recording analyzed in this study is a 6‐s period from 15:00:03 to 15:00:09 UTC on 13 May 2011.…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Each receiver is a wideband vertical electric field sensor that samples every 1 μs, with an amplitude resolution of ∼35 μV/m and timing accuracy of ∼20 ns (Füllekrug, ). The accuracy of the array measurements has been shown to be close to instrumental limits (Füllekrug et al, , section 6). The time of the recording analyzed in this study is a 6‐s period from 15:00:03 to 15:00:09 UTC on 13 May 2011.…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The array analysis described in section 2 is specifically designed to infer robust estimates for the wave number vector, electromagnetic source field, and the spatial and temporal quality of low‐frequency radio waves with small electric field strengths observed with an array. Here we make use of recordings with an array of N = 10 radio receivers distributed over an area ∼1 km × 1 km on Charmy Down airfield near Bath in the UK (Füllekrug et al, ; Mezentsev & Füllekrug, ). Electric field strengths are measured with a sampling frequency of 1 MHz, an amplitude resolution of ∼25μV/m and a timing uncertainty ∼20 ns (Füllekrug, ).…”
Section: Continuum Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet the electromagnetic source field incorporates all the information about the physical processes that cause the observed radio waves. The electromagnetic source field can be displayed in a constellation diagram, which is a bivariate distribution function for the normalized real and imaginary part of the electromagnetic source field (Füllekrug et al, , Figure 2, right). Here we make use of the pulsed radio transmissions from the UK radio clock at 60 (±1) kHz, LORAN transmitters for marine navigation at 100 (±10) kHz (Mezentsev & Füllekrug, ; Füllekrug et al, , and references therein), and lightning discharges at 10 (±5) kHz toward a more detailed assessment of continuum radiation.…”
Section: Continuum Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the exemplary phase stability of chorus wave packets in near Earth space was determined on board of Van Allen Probe spacecraft by explicit use of the instantaneous frequency (Santolik et al, ). More recently, the phase stability has been used to map the source locations of electromagnetic signals in the sky (Füllekrug et al, ; see also Füllekrug, Mezentsev, et al, ; Füllekrug, Smith, et al, ; Füllekrug et al, ). This phase stability is an important prerequisite to successfully map well‐focused source locations in the sky, in particular for the coherent signals of continuum radiation that are found up to 2 orders of magnitude below the noise floor of the radio receivers used (Füllekrug et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%