2005
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Array comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) analysis of premenopausal breast cancers from a nuclear fallout area and matched cases from Western New York

Abstract: High-resolution array comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) analysis of DNA copy number aberrations (CNAs) was performed on breast carcinomas in premenopausal women from Western New York (WNY) and from Gomel, Belarus, an area exposed to fallout from the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear accident. Genomic DNA was isolated from 47 frozen tumour specimens from 42 patients and hybridised to arrays spotted with more than 3000 BAC clones. In all, 20 samples were from WNY and 27 were from Belarus. In total, 34 samples were p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, while some of these studies did not differentiate between Grade 1, Grade 2, and Grade 3 tumors (Loo et al, 2004;Naylor et al, 2005;Nessling et al, 2005;Varma et al, 2005;Bergamaschi et al, 2006;Fridlyand et al, 2006), other studies performed array CGH using clone sets that did not contain DNA sequence representation within 5 Mb of RP11-10G10 (Somiari et al, 2004;Callagy et al, 2005;Chin et al, 2007). The report of Pierga and colleagues included no Grade 1 tumors, while the report of Stange and colleagues included only two Grade 1 tumors (Stange et al, 2006;Pierga et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, while some of these studies did not differentiate between Grade 1, Grade 2, and Grade 3 tumors (Loo et al, 2004;Naylor et al, 2005;Nessling et al, 2005;Varma et al, 2005;Bergamaschi et al, 2006;Fridlyand et al, 2006), other studies performed array CGH using clone sets that did not contain DNA sequence representation within 5 Mb of RP11-10G10 (Somiari et al, 2004;Callagy et al, 2005;Chin et al, 2007). The report of Pierga and colleagues included no Grade 1 tumors, while the report of Stange and colleagues included only two Grade 1 tumors (Stange et al, 2006;Pierga et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…More recent studies have explored genome copy number alterations in invasive breast carcinomas using array-based CGH in relation to tumor pathology, and would therefore have the potential to validate association of 8q22 gains with Grade 3 tumors (Loo et al, 2004;Somiari et al, 2004;Callagy et al, 2005;Naylor et al, 2005;Nessling et al, 2005;Varma et al, 2005;Bergamaschi et al, 2006;Chin et al, 2006Chin et al, , 2007Fridlyand et al, 2006;Stange et al, 2006;Pierga et al, 2007). However, while some of these studies did not differentiate between Grade 1, Grade 2, and Grade 3 tumors (Loo et al, 2004;Naylor et al, 2005;Nessling et al, 2005;Varma et al, 2005;Bergamaschi et al, 2006;Fridlyand et al, 2006), other studies performed array CGH using clone sets that did not contain DNA sequence representation within 5 Mb of RP11-10G10 (Somiari et al, 2004;Callagy et al, 2005;Chin et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For determining tetraspanin 1 (TSPAN1) mRNA expression levels in human breast cancer tissues, we utilized residual RNA extracts from a prior study of primary breast carcinomas (Varma et al 2005). For determining TSPAN1 mRNA expression levels in breast cell lines, we utilized residual RNA extracts from a previously published research study that identiWed the tetraspanin NET-6 as a new breast cancer suppressor gene (Huang et al , 2007.…”
Section: Tissue Samples and Cell Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These arrays consist of DNA from individual bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) tiled at varying intervals across the genome, where the resolution of the array is roughly proportional to the density of clones on the array. This technology has been used extensively over the past few years to study a wide variety of different cancer cell types (Brookman-Amissah et al, 2005;Nowak et al, 2005;Rossi et al, 2005;Varma et al, 2005). These aCGH studies, while more successful in identifying amplifications, have also been used to pinpoint consistent small deletions (Rossi et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%