2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2009.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis of adult acute leukemia patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
16
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CBL and Egr2 were selected as putative miR-150 targets as they are known to be deregulated in leukemia and contain predicted miR-150-binding sites in their 3 0 -UTR (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33). We confirmed downregulation of these genes by qRT-PCR as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Restoration Of Mir-150 In Mll-af9 Cells Impairs the Colony Isupporting
confidence: 54%
“…CBL and Egr2 were selected as putative miR-150 targets as they are known to be deregulated in leukemia and contain predicted miR-150-binding sites in their 3 0 -UTR (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33). We confirmed downregulation of these genes by qRT-PCR as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Restoration Of Mir-150 In Mll-af9 Cells Impairs the Colony Isupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Rearrangements of the RB1 gene in pre-B ALL were found in 38% of pediatric patients [23]. Other authors have also found RB1 gene deletion exclusively in B-ALL, in 16% of children and 11% of adults, respectively [17,18]. Our findings did not support this observation because RB1 gene deletions were present in both T and B-lineage ALL.…”
Section: F -Female; M -Male; Ir -Intermediate Risk; Sr -Standard Riskcontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…According to various authors these alterations are present in 2-38% of patients [15][16][17]. Discrepancies in findings of different authors may result from various methods employed, distinct leukemia types and differences in ethnicity of studied patients [4,5,18,19]. The percentage of cells showing deletions has not been evaluated in individual ALL patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…aCGH overcomes the limitations of conventional cytogenetic analysis by allowing for a more in depth assessment of the genome in AML patients. These findings will likely better characterize the intermediate- and poor-risk categories of AML and will facilitate detection of additional abnormalities in favorable-risk AML patients that may further aid in risk stratification, as a subset of patients in the favorable-risk group respond well to therapy [5,13,14,16,21,22]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases assessed by conventional cytogenetic analysis of FISH, aCGH can show additional genomic imbalances emphasizing the advantages of a whole-genome approach [1,4,5,1113]. Despite the great potential of aCGH to assess cases of AML, relatively few studies of AML patients assessed by aCGH have been published [1416]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%