2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.11.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization as a Diagnostic Tool for Syndromic Heart Defects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
70
2
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
70
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] We also examined primary articles and reviews of CNVs in autism, 13 schizophrenia, 14 mental retardation, 15 and congenital heart disease 16 for references to studies reporting subjects with 1q21.1 duplications. [17][18][19][20] Other citations involving 1q21.1 duplication cases were also assessed. [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] Cases of 1q21.1 duplication in GeneReviews (http://www.ncbi.nlm.…”
Section: Materials and Methods Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1,2,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] We also examined primary articles and reviews of CNVs in autism, 13 schizophrenia, 14 mental retardation, 15 and congenital heart disease 16 for references to studies reporting subjects with 1q21.1 duplications. [17][18][19][20] Other citations involving 1q21.1 duplication cases were also assessed. [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] Cases of 1q21.1 duplication in GeneReviews (http://www.ncbi.nlm.…”
Section: Materials and Methods Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,35 We systematically reviewed 28 primary reports identified and their accompanying supplemental materials to identify unique individuals and abstract as much information as possible on each subject. 1,2,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] Any subjects with 1q21.1 duplications that were not 1.0-5.0 Mb (Figure 1) in size were excluded, 12,31 allowing us to include atypical variants that were larger or smaller than the standard duplication classes used in our analyses. We documented the ascertainment criteria, country of origin, authors, and the demographic, clinical, and genotypic characteristics of subjects in different studies, and used these variables to attempt to identify duplicate cases reported in two or more papers.…”
Section: Materials and Methods Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, there is evidence that genetic testing is frequently underutilized in infants with CHD 55,56 . Nevertheless, the importance of genetic evaluation of patients with CHD has been emphasized in a position statement from the American Heart Association 57 , which cites four specific reasons to pursue testing:…”
Section: Diagnostic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These developments are significant: an ever-growing body of studies indicate that pathogenic CNVs are a major cause of CHDs, occurring in 3-25% of patients with extra-cardiac abnormalities and in 3-10% of patients with isolated heart defects (reviewed in Lander et al 9 ). In practice, the relatively limited resolutions of karyotyping and FISH have rendered them insufficient to detect a genetic cause in the majority of patients with CHDs of uncertain etiology 55 and in nearly half of all patients with syndromic CHD 61 . Therefore, use of CMA as a higher fidelity option for firstline CHD genetic testing has been recommended, particularly when extra-cardiac features are present and a suspected diagnosis is lacking 61 .…”
Section: Genetic Testing and Emerging Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%