2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(03)00199-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arrested neuronal proliferation and impaired hippocampal function following fractionated brain irradiation in the adult rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
297
2
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 424 publications
(315 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
11
297
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…To circumvent some of the problems associated with systemic administration of cytostatic agents such as MAM, some studies have used localized irradiation to reduce the population of newly generated cells in the DG (Madsen et al, 2003;Raber et al, 2004;Rola et al, 2004;Snyder et al, 2005). Moreover, irradiation has the advantage over antimitotic agents in that the population of new cells is usually depleted completely rather than just reduced.…”
Section: Evidence In Favormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To circumvent some of the problems associated with systemic administration of cytostatic agents such as MAM, some studies have used localized irradiation to reduce the population of newly generated cells in the DG (Madsen et al, 2003;Raber et al, 2004;Rola et al, 2004;Snyder et al, 2005). Moreover, irradiation has the advantage over antimitotic agents in that the population of new cells is usually depleted completely rather than just reduced.…”
Section: Evidence In Favormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have reported deficits in various types of hippocampal-dependent learning tasks. For example, the performance of irradiated rats was impaired on a hippocampal-dependent place recognition task, but not on an object recognition task, which is not dependent on the hippocampus (Madsen et al, 2003;Rola et al, 2004). However, like the antimitotic agents, there are some possible side effects of using irradiation to block adult neurogenesis, which could inadvertently affect performance.…”
Section: Evidence In Favormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the hippocampus has been recognized as one of the regions where neural stem cells (NSCs) continue to proliferate and generate neurons throughout life. In the animal model of cranial irradiation, neural stem/precursor cells in the hippocampus undergo apoptosis, and neurogenesis is suppressed (Peissner et al, 1999;Madsen et al, 2003;Limoli et al, 2004). Monje et al(2002) studied the association between the radiation effects on NSCs and changes in the microenvironment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of radiation was dose dependent, with cell death in the proliferating cells occurring within 3 to 6 hours after treatment, and lasted at least up to 120 days after irradiation [63]. In the learning tasks that are known to require hippocampus-controlled memory function (eg, place-recognition task [64], spatial learning in the Barnes maze [65]), the mice with reduced hippocampal neurogenesis performed more poorly than controls, whereas they were not impaired in hippocampus-independent learning (eg, object-recognition task [64], elevated plus maze [65]). Similar dependency on hippocampus-related function was observed in trace conditioning tasks [60,61] and in the basic non-matching-to-sample (NMTS) task, in which an animal must associate stimuli that are separated in time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%