2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/ismar55827.2022.00098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arrow, Bézier Curve, or Halos? – Comparing 3D Out-of-View Object Visualization Techniques for Handheld Augmented Reality

Abstract: Figure 1: We compared different 3D out-of-view object visualizations for handheld AR displays: A 3D arrow pointing towards the POI (left), a Bezier ´curve leading to the POI (middle), and pulsing 3D halos starting at the POI's position (right).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(105 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gruenefeld et al [GLH * 18] had similar task performance results, but found a lower workload for Arrow, which could be due to our scenario with its many targets. Our animated Arrow resulted in worse results than the static arrows of Wieland et al [WGRF22] and Yu et al [YLF * 20], which could be due to its usage as a baseline condition based on familiarity reasons. Since Wieland et al [WGRF22] only considered a single target at a time, we assume that their arrow approach would also result in clutter for multiple targets.…”
Section: Observations and Lessons Learnedmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Gruenefeld et al [GLH * 18] had similar task performance results, but found a lower workload for Arrow, which could be due to our scenario with its many targets. Our animated Arrow resulted in worse results than the static arrows of Wieland et al [WGRF22] and Yu et al [YLF * 20], which could be due to its usage as a baseline condition based on familiarity reasons. Since Wieland et al [WGRF22] only considered a single target at a time, we assume that their arrow approach would also result in clutter for multiple targets.…”
Section: Observations and Lessons Learnedmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Our animated Arrow resulted in worse results than the static arrows of Wieland et al [WGRF22] and Yu et al [YLF * 20], which could be due to its usage as a baseline condition based on familiarity reasons. Since Wieland et al [WGRF22] only considered a single target at a time, we assume that their arrow approach would also result in clutter for multiple targets. One reason might be the clutter introduced by Arrow that affects its ability to highlight many targets.…”
Section: Observations and Lessons Learnedmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations