2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arsenic and iron removal from groundwater by oxidation–coagulation at optimized pH: Laboratory and field studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cake layer formed mainly because of precipitation of Fe(OH) 3 and MnO 2 as explained in the earlier section. Bordoloi et al [21] reported that the SEM image with EDS analysis of arsenic (As) and iron (Fe) removal from groundwater by oxidation-coagulation at optimized pH revealed that the sorption of As onto the poorly crystalline precipitate of Fe(OH) 3 and existence of a small amount of MnO 2 . The FESEM images of the precipitate obtained in the presence of Fe and Mn for filtration by both PA-NF and PA-UF membranes at adjusted pH of feed solutions are depicted in Figure 5 …”
Section: Surface Morphology Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cake layer formed mainly because of precipitation of Fe(OH) 3 and MnO 2 as explained in the earlier section. Bordoloi et al [21] reported that the SEM image with EDS analysis of arsenic (As) and iron (Fe) removal from groundwater by oxidation-coagulation at optimized pH revealed that the sorption of As onto the poorly crystalline precipitate of Fe(OH) 3 and existence of a small amount of MnO 2 . The FESEM images of the precipitate obtained in the presence of Fe and Mn for filtration by both PA-NF and PA-UF membranes at adjusted pH of feed solutions are depicted in Figure 5 …”
Section: Surface Morphology Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several efficient iron removal techniques, e.g., electrocoagulation (Ghosh et al, 2008), oxidation-coagulation (Bordoloi et al, 2013), solvent extraction (Quijada-Maldonado et al, 2016), microfiltration (Ellis et al, 2000), aerated granular filter (Bong-Yeon., 2005), ion exchange (Vaaramaa et al, 2003) and adsorption (Seliem et al, 2016). All of the above techniques, adsorption provides an attractive alternative treatment to other removal techniques because it is more economical and readily available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation in methyl substitution degree can lead to remarkable differences in the adsorption behavior of As onto Fe/Al oxides. Coagulation by Fe-and Al-based salts have been used as the most practical choice for As removal from drinking water [18,19]. Many studies have investigated the coagulation removal of inorganic As [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%