2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arsenic-contaminated groundwaters remediation by nanofiltration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The membrane processes are considered an interesting alternative to the conventional methods considering their many benefits, but few are the applications on natural Ascontaminated groundwaters. Figoli et al [89,90] analyzed the efficiency of two commercial nanofiltration (NF) membranes in terms of As rejection and water production, also as function of the feed composition by testing three contaminated groundwaters with As contents ranging from 59 to 435 µg L −1 . The authors compared their satisfactory results with those reported in the literature providing a useful data collection to identify suitable NF membranes to be applied in similar contaminated sites.…”
Section: Removal Of As From Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The membrane processes are considered an interesting alternative to the conventional methods considering their many benefits, but few are the applications on natural Ascontaminated groundwaters. Figoli et al [89,90] analyzed the efficiency of two commercial nanofiltration (NF) membranes in terms of As rejection and water production, also as function of the feed composition by testing three contaminated groundwaters with As contents ranging from 59 to 435 µg L −1 . The authors compared their satisfactory results with those reported in the literature providing a useful data collection to identify suitable NF membranes to be applied in similar contaminated sites.…”
Section: Removal Of As From Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of rural supplies, removing arsenic at the local scale is often the only option to meet the WHO and national acceptance thresholds (10 µg/L) [48]. This hints at the need to develop methods that can be implemented on the ground [48][49][50]. Priority chemical contamination remains a major challenge for the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 62 water samples from the Pollino National Park area were collected during the present study and analyzed for major components. The sampling methodologies were already described by [61][62][63][64][65][66]; however, a brief description is reported here. In the field, the physicochemical parameters like temperature, pH, oxidation-reduction potential (Eh), and electrical conductivity (EC) were determined by using a previously calibrated multiparametric probe (Hanna Instruments HI-9828) whereas total alkalinity was determined by acidimetric titration using HCl 0.05 N as the titrating agent and methyl orange as the indicator.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%