2008
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.10623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arsenic in Drinking-Water and Risk for Cancer in Denmark

Abstract: BackgroundArsenic is a well-known carcinogen, which is often found in drinking-water. Epidemiologic studies have shown increased cancer risks among individuals exposed to high concentrations of arsenic in drinking-water, whereas studies of the carcinogenic effect of low doses have had inconsistent results.ObjectiveOur aim was to determine if exposure to low levels of arsenic in drinking-water in Denmark is associated with an increased risk for cancer.MethodsThe study was based on a prospective Danish cohort of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
122
0
15

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
122
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Anecdotally, a Dutch population study that examined the effects of low doses of arsenic concentrations in drinking water on cancer risk found that arsenic did not increase the risk of multiple cancer types. In fact, increasing concentrations of arsenic in the water correlated with a decreased risk of nonmelanoma skin cancers (56). This reduced risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer (which includes BCC) may be partially due to the effects of arsenic on Hh signaling.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Anecdotally, a Dutch population study that examined the effects of low doses of arsenic concentrations in drinking water on cancer risk found that arsenic did not increase the risk of multiple cancer types. In fact, increasing concentrations of arsenic in the water correlated with a decreased risk of nonmelanoma skin cancers (56). This reduced risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer (which includes BCC) may be partially due to the effects of arsenic on Hh signaling.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Previous studies have conducted human health risk evaluations of heavy metals through various exposure pathways (Baastrup et al, 2008;Hough et al, 2004;Man et al, 2010;Mari et al, 2009), but little research on the key exposure route has been performed (Qu et al, 2012), with even less focus on coking plants due to the lack of systematic multipathway risk analyses. Therefore, studying the contaminant levels of environmental media around coking areas and assessing the aggregated exposure to heavy metals and metalloids via various environmental media and pathways are necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These species may enter the human body through inhalation of dust, direct ingestion of soil and water, dermal contact of contaminated soil and water, and consumption of vegetables grown in contaminated fields. Various studies have been conducted to evaluate population health risks due to heavy metal exposure through various exposure pathways, especially soil and food chain [17,18,19,20,21,22]. Since it is difficult to identify the key exposure route because of lack of multipathway risk analysis, media or pathway-specific approach may fail to ensure public safety [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%