2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40726-019-0102-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arsenic in Drinking Water: Is 10 μg/L a Safe Limit?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, the recording of Uranium concentrations in the Shatt al-Arab water during the spring and summer seasons in comparison to the absence of any concentration during the winter and autumn seasons,it may be due to the large bodies of water that entered from Iranian lands in the spring of 2019 that entered the Shatt al-Arab via the Sweib River passing through the Hawizehmarsh, which may contain part of the contaminated war remnants. Where the Shatt al-Arab received large water bodies due to the torrents from Iran which extended from spring 2019 until the summer of the same year ,in addition, the Shatt al-Arab is a center for large quantities of various sediments, which may reach more than 200,000 tons annually (Albadran et al, 2002).Furthermore in the current study, the high concentrations of Uranium in the spring and summer seasons in the water compared with the winter and autumn seasons are not considered a threat to human life compared to the reports of the World Health Organization(WHO) (Frisbie et al, 2013), as well as in the present study, the values of Arsenic levels in water gave safe determinants compared to the World Health Organization standard (10 µg /l) for drinking water (Driehaus et al, 1998;Ahmad and Bhattacharya, 2019). In addition, the current study the values of Beryllium concentrations was below the detection limit in water for all seasons and this may be due to nature of pH in Shatt Al-Arab River where it are alkaline .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…In the current study, the recording of Uranium concentrations in the Shatt al-Arab water during the spring and summer seasons in comparison to the absence of any concentration during the winter and autumn seasons,it may be due to the large bodies of water that entered from Iranian lands in the spring of 2019 that entered the Shatt al-Arab via the Sweib River passing through the Hawizehmarsh, which may contain part of the contaminated war remnants. Where the Shatt al-Arab received large water bodies due to the torrents from Iran which extended from spring 2019 until the summer of the same year ,in addition, the Shatt al-Arab is a center for large quantities of various sediments, which may reach more than 200,000 tons annually (Albadran et al, 2002).Furthermore in the current study, the high concentrations of Uranium in the spring and summer seasons in the water compared with the winter and autumn seasons are not considered a threat to human life compared to the reports of the World Health Organization(WHO) (Frisbie et al, 2013), as well as in the present study, the values of Arsenic levels in water gave safe determinants compared to the World Health Organization standard (10 µg /l) for drinking water (Driehaus et al, 1998;Ahmad and Bhattacharya, 2019). In addition, the current study the values of Beryllium concentrations was below the detection limit in water for all seasons and this may be due to nature of pH in Shatt Al-Arab River where it are alkaline .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Shell-by-shell fits of the Fourier-transformed Mn K-edge EXAFS spectrum of the Ref O 2 sample (Fig 3.8, Table 3.3) returned an Mn-O interatomic distance (R Mn-O ) of 1.93±0.02 Å and an Mn-O coordination number (CN Mn-O ) of 1.9±0.5, which is lower than the theoretical CN of 6 for octahedrally coordinated Mn(III). These (Table 3.3) and longer than the edge-sharing Mn-Mn bond in groutite (Wyckoff 1963). However, the fit-derived R Mn-Mn/Fe value for this sample is in good agreement with the edge-sharing Fe-Fe bond length in the Fe(III) precipitates that formed in this sample (i.e.…”
Section: O 2 Experimentssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The biosensor demonstrated detection of As 3+ in the linear dynamic range of 0.01-10 µg/L and a detection limit of 0.003 × 10 −3 µg/L. These specifications are suited well to the regulatory limit of 10 µg/L recommended by the World Health Organization (Ahmad and Bhattacharya, 2019). Additionally, the biosensor was used to detect As 3+ obtained from six different ground water sources in India as well as one river sample.…”
Section: Arsenicmentioning
confidence: 85%