2020
DOI: 10.1080/10286632.2020.1765163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Art, antiquities, and blockchain: new approaches to the restitution of cultural heritage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the problem of insufficient performance, the authorization mechanism of the delegated proof of stake algorithm is applied to PBFT, which improves the efficiency of the algorithm reaching consensus. In terms of system efficiency, Whitaker et al (2021) proposed an effective query method, ElasticQM, for the scalable model of blockchain storage capacity, which stores data in user layer, query layer, storage layer, and data layer modules, thereby improving the system query performance. Maity and Sharma (2020) described a consensus mechanism for the security of dynamic data storage based on blockchain and provided a mathematical model of the security problem of dynamic data storage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the problem of insufficient performance, the authorization mechanism of the delegated proof of stake algorithm is applied to PBFT, which improves the efficiency of the algorithm reaching consensus. In terms of system efficiency, Whitaker et al (2021) proposed an effective query method, ElasticQM, for the scalable model of blockchain storage capacity, which stores data in user layer, query layer, storage layer, and data layer modules, thereby improving the system query performance. Maity and Sharma (2020) described a consensus mechanism for the security of dynamic data storage based on blockchain and provided a mathematical model of the security problem of dynamic data storage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results confirm that blockchain technology is primarily applied as a guarantee of the authenticity of works of art, manuscripts, and intellectual property in the cultural heritage industry [34]. Based on a systematic content analysis of the 15 empirical studies of blockchain and cultural heritage, we develop a framework and highlight the relationship between blockchain use cases and cultural heritage, as shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In this way, the work can be subsequently exchanged, traded, or held by collectors, just as any other rare artifact can. The blockchain enables, as some scholars [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] suggest, a fair trade in cultural and ancient heritage. In fact, with the decoupling of property rights and the possibility of shared income, users who are geographically separated can purchase a token that represents part of the project and/or cultural asset, intensifying the enhancement of ancient assets and support for culture.…”
Section: Tokenization and Fractional Equitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For different procurement activities, the difficulty of procurement management is also different due to the different procurement objectives, procurement environment, and the complexity of procurement materials. In different business environments, the operation and coverage of procurement management are also different [13].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%