2003
DOI: 10.1177/1077800403254225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Art as Inquiry: The Autopsy of an [Art] Experience

Abstract: In this article, I explore transgressive experience by embracing my personal encounters with art and life. In accordance with a phenomenological approach, I emphasize immediate experience, description, and analysis of the world as a source of knowledge and understanding. From the perspective both of art education and research, I attempt to show the enslaving effect of conventions. Furthermore, I trace and lay bare the origins of my transgressive experience from a methodological viewpoint by describing and inte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, I engage with and interpret the data drawn from each Con as its own unique episode (e.g., Saarnivaara, 2003) through four analytical themes—suspending, bodying forth, sensuous encountering, and being informed (Seeley, 2006; Seeley & Reason, 2008). These themes represent a presentational way of knowing (Heron, 1992; Seeley, 2006) that suits the movement and creative production associated with attending Cons.…”
Section: To Con As Artistic Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, I engage with and interpret the data drawn from each Con as its own unique episode (e.g., Saarnivaara, 2003) through four analytical themes—suspending, bodying forth, sensuous encountering, and being informed (Seeley, 2006; Seeley & Reason, 2008). These themes represent a presentational way of knowing (Heron, 1992; Seeley, 2006) that suits the movement and creative production associated with attending Cons.…”
Section: To Con As Artistic Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Le processus narratif, qu'il soit sous forme de mots ou d'images, sert à marquer(délimiter),àarticuler(mettreenordre)etclarifier(expliquer)l'expériencetemporellevécue,c'est-à-dire qu'ilparticipeàlaconstructionde l'identiténarrative (Ricoeur, 1990 (BochneretEllis,2003;Chenail,2008).Onconstateque l'oeuvreartistiquedevientunesituationd'interlocution,unactedeprisedeparoleayantlepouvoirdetransformer le monde et les perceptions. Le témoignage mis en scène artistiquement s'inscrit de façon plus générale dans le courant émergent universitaire de l'arts-based research (ABR), de la narrative inquiry (Saarnivaara, 2003) et artist/research/teacher(A/R/T) (IrwinetdeCosson,2005).…”
Section: Narrationdesoienmotsetenimagesunclassified
“…The second paradigm considers artistic practice as a method. In this view, artistic research rests on a merging of art and inquiry (Saarnivaara, 2003) in the form of holistic or integrated approach (Hunter et al, 2002). In this paradigm, problem-centre or issue-centre of the research and the problem at the centre of research dictates the methodology (Leavy, 2015;Makela, & Routarinne, 2006;Biggs & Büchler, 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%