2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0888-3270(03)00073-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ART–KOHONEN neural network for fault diagnosis of rotating machinery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
81
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to maintain a better diagnosis performance, the selection of sensitive features which provide characteristic information for the diagnosis system needs to be done, and irrelevant or redundant features must be removed. Here, a new parameter evaluation technique based on distance discriminant technique [19] is proposed, which includes the similarity formula (3). The feature selection process can be described as follows.…”
Section: Features Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to maintain a better diagnosis performance, the selection of sensitive features which provide characteristic information for the diagnosis system needs to be done, and irrelevant or redundant features must be removed. Here, a new parameter evaluation technique based on distance discriminant technique [19] is proposed, which includes the similarity formula (3). The feature selection process can be described as follows.…”
Section: Features Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding effectiveness factor of the jth (j =1 ,2 ,⋯, 95) feature is denoted as α j (see Ref. [19] for more details on the distance-based evaluation approach). The features with a larger effectiveness factor are more sensitive to these particular fault types.…”
Section: Tkdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, applying too many feature parameters can be a burden to networks since calculating the results can be very timeconsuming. A feature extraction technique [15] is applied here to extract some parameters which can properly represent the fault features taken from total parameters.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%