Art of Disaster Preparedness in European Union: a Survey on the Health Systems

Abstract

Introduction: Naturally occurring and man-made disasters have been increasing in the world, including Europe, over the past several decades. Health systems are a key part of any community disaster management system. The success of preparedness and prevention depends on the success of activities such as disaster planning, organization and training. The aim of this study is to evaluate health system preparedness for disasters in the 27 European Union member countries. Method: A cross-sectional analysis study was completed between June-September 2012. The checklist used for this survey was a modified from the World Health Organization toolkit for assessing health-system capacity for crisis management. Three specialists from each of the 27 European Union countries were included in the survey. Responses to each survey question were scored and the range of preparedness level was defined as 0-100%, categorized in three levels as follows: Acceptable; Transitional; or Insufficient. Results: Response rate was 79.1%. The average level of disaster management preparedness in the health systems of 27 European Union member states was 68% (Acceptable). The highest level of preparedness was seen in the United Kingdom, Luxemburg, and Lithuania. Considering the elements of disaster management system, the highest level of preparedness score was at health information elements (86%), and the lowest level was for hospitals, and educational elements (54%). Conclusion: This survey study suggests that preparedness level of European Union countries in 2012 is at an acceptable level but could be improved. Elements such as hospitals and education and training suffer from insufficient levels of preparedness. The European Union health systems need a collective strategic plan, as well as enough resources, to establish a comprehensive and standardized disaster management strategy plan. A competency based training curriculum for managers and first responders is basic to accomplishing this goal. Keywords: Disaster medicine; Disaster preparedness; Disaster epidemiology; Health systems; European Union

Health system preparedness in Pakistan for crisis management: a cross-sectional evaluation study

“…The use of a validated instrument administered by trained personnel from the relevant areas of expertise lends credibility to this evaluation. With less than 30% of district-level indicators classifiable as acceptably prepared, the level of preparedness in these most vulnerable areas of a disaster prone country is almost half of that reported for locales (28) at very low levels of vulnerability (15). Development of human resources, training and education was second only to health system financing mechanisms in lack of preparedness.…”

“…Preparedness for natural or manmade, predictable or unpredictable disasters (24) at district management as well secondary and tertiary health care delivery facilities was assessed using indicators documented in the toolkit published by the WHO Regional Office for Europe (EURO) in 2012 (27). Benchmark cutoffs were adopted from previous such assessments in the European Union using the same instrument (28). Analysis of published studies regarding disastrous situations from locales as diverse as the Caribbean, Africa, North America, Europe, Pakistan and Japan has shown that actual experience "supports the content and value of the WHO toolkit" (29).…”

“…Two group comparisons of scores are done using t-tests while multiple group comparisons are done using Kruskal-Wallis test. Conformity scores are categorized as inadequately prepared (score ≤ 35%), partially prepared (36-65%), or acceptable (66-100%) (28). Ninety-five percent confidence intervals are reported for estimation of parameters and all tests of significance are two-tailed at an alpha of 0.05.…”

Preparedness of Iranian Hospitals Against Disasters

“…Seventy percent of the hospitals responded to the questionnaire, from which 68% of the hospitals were in the first group (acceptable), and the highest preparedness was for England, Lithuania, and Luxemburg. The highest level of preparedness relates to information component and the lowest relates to training (29).…”

Political Science Perspectives

“…Many European countries have adopted a similar approach to hazard management (Djalali et al 2014). France, for example, moved away from a disaster-specific system and adopted a complex risk approach, which aims to prepare the country for an array of multifaceted and often cascading hazards (Renda-Tenali and Mancebo 2009).…”