2015
DOI: 10.3855/jidc.7015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artemisinin resistance, some facts and opinions

Abstract: Resistance to artemisinin derivatives (ARTs) in malaria disease is currently defined as a delayed parasite clearance following artemisinin combined therapy (ACT). Although ACT is still widely effective, the first evidence of artemisinin resistance was described in 2009 in Southeast Asia. Since then, resistance to ARTs / ACT has been monitored showing an increasing trend. The demonstrated resistance to all drugs that are currently associated to ART, the ambiguous finding that ART resistance is observed only in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the co-occurrence of ART resistance and resistance to the partner drugs was described to be associated to high rates of clinical treatment failure [23,26]. In addition, the available ART resistance markers are affected by some technical limitations: i) their sensitivity and specificity are still undefined [27]; ii) resistance to mefloquine and piperaquine is, by itself, a demonstrated cause of clinical treatment failure of ACTs but the absence of a genetic marker cannot exclude drug resistance; iii) the rate of clearance of parasitized erythrocytes is multi-factorial being influenced by resistance to anti-malarial drugs and host factors, such as immunity and mutations affecting erythrocyte viability (G6PD deficiency and thalassemias) that may vary in the different areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the co-occurrence of ART resistance and resistance to the partner drugs was described to be associated to high rates of clinical treatment failure [23,26]. In addition, the available ART resistance markers are affected by some technical limitations: i) their sensitivity and specificity are still undefined [27]; ii) resistance to mefloquine and piperaquine is, by itself, a demonstrated cause of clinical treatment failure of ACTs but the absence of a genetic marker cannot exclude drug resistance; iii) the rate of clearance of parasitized erythrocytes is multi-factorial being influenced by resistance to anti-malarial drugs and host factors, such as immunity and mutations affecting erythrocyte viability (G6PD deficiency and thalassemias) that may vary in the different areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum has spread to most malaria-manifested areas up to date. Even for the most effective antimalarial drug artemisinin, its resistance was first reported in 2008, which has become a major issue in parts of Southeast Asia. ,− To tackle these important problems, there is an urgent requirement for new antimalarial drugs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Because strains of P falciparum are rapidly emerging that are resistant to all known antimalarial drugs, including artemisinin, quinine, chloroquine, piperaquine, and mefloquine and their derivatives, considerable emphasis is now being focused on development of new therapies with novel mechanisms of action. [2][3][4][5][6] Although reports of promising new antimalarials are now appearing in the literature, [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] that vast majority of these novel drug candidates target parasite-encoded proteins/pathways, leaving the opportunity open for adventitious parasites to mutate resistance to the new therapeutics. As noted by others, the ideal solution to this problem would emerge if new antimalarials could be developed that would function by inhibiting a hostencoded protein/pathway that the parasite must coopt in order to survive and proliferate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%