2022
DOI: 10.3171/2021.7.peds21302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arterial spin labeling as an ancillary assessment to postoperative conventional angiogram in pediatric moyamoya disease

Abstract: OBJECTIVE Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is commonly performed after pial synangiosis surgery for pediatric moyamoya disease to assess the degree of neovascularization. However, angiography is invasive, and the risk of ionizing radiation is a concern in children. In this study, the authors aimed to identify whether arterial spin labeling (ASL) can predict postoperative angiogram grading. In addition, they sought to determine whether patients who underwent ASL imaging without DSA had similar postoperativ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New surface collaterals are also seen well on axial MRA and on MIPs, although their true extent is typically revealed to be significantly greater on catheter angiograms. Previous studies have evaluated revascularization after moyamoya surgery using MRA MIP images [17,18] or ASL imaging [19][20][21][22], or have compared the postoperative diameters of the STA and ipsilateral MMA to their preoperative diameters on MRA and/or catheter angiography [18,20,23]. No previous studies have used contralateral vessel diameters as internal controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New surface collaterals are also seen well on axial MRA and on MIPs, although their true extent is typically revealed to be significantly greater on catheter angiograms. Previous studies have evaluated revascularization after moyamoya surgery using MRA MIP images [17,18] or ASL imaging [19][20][21][22], or have compared the postoperative diameters of the STA and ipsilateral MMA to their preoperative diameters on MRA and/or catheter angiography [18,20,23]. No previous studies have used contralateral vessel diameters as internal controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%