Background:The jugular vein cutdown for a totally implantable central venous port (TICVP) has 2 disadvantages: 2 separate incisions are needed and the risk for multiple vein occlusions. We sought to evaluate the feasibility of a cephalic vein (CV) cutdown in children.
Methods:We prospectively followed patients who underwent a venous cutdown for implantation of a TICVP between Jan. 1, 2002, and Dec. 31, 2006. For patients younger than 8 months, an external jugular vein cutdown was initially tried without attempting a CV cutdown. For patients older than 8 months, a CV cutdown was tried initially. We recorded information on age, weight, outcome of the CV cutdown and complications.Results: During the study period, 143 patients underwent a venous cutdown for implantation of a TICVP: 25 younger and 118 older than 8 months. The CV cutdown was successful in 73 of 118 trials. The 25th percentile and median body weight for 73 successful cases were 15.4 kg and 28.3 kg, respectively. There was a significant difference in the success rate using the criterion of 15 kg as the cutoff. The overall complication rate was 8.2%.
Conclusion:The CV cutdown was an acceptable procedure for TICVP in children. It could be preferentially considered for patients weighing more than 15 kg who require TICVP.Contexte : La dissection de la jugulaire pour la mise en place d'un dispositif d'accès veineux central totalement implantable comporte 2 inconvénients : 2 incisions distinctes sont nécessaires et il y a un risque de multiples occlusions veineuses. Nous avons voulu évaluer la faisabilité d'une dissection de la veine céphalique chez les enfants.Méthodes : Nous avons suivi de manière prospective des patients soumis à une dissection veineuse pour implantation d'un dispositif d'accès veineux central entre le 1er janvier 2002 et le 31 décembre 2006. Pour les patients de moins de 8 mois, une dissection de la jugulaire externe a d'abord été tentée, sans tentative de dissection de la veine céphalique. Pour les patients de plus de 8 mois, une dissection de la veine céphalique a d'abord été tentée. Nous avons noté l'âge, le poids, l'issue de la dissection de la veine céphalique et les complications. 4 Repeated trials and long-term in dwelling of the central venous catheter eventually lead to exhaustion of readily and easily accessible vessels. Although the calibre of the cephalic vein (CV) is usually smaller than that of the jugular veins, these disadvantages can be overcome by properly performing a CV cutdown. The jugular vein can be preserved for a period by using the CV first. Most published studies have involved adult patients; [5][6][7] there are few reports on the CV cutdown in children. Our objective was to analyze the results of CV cutdown and to provide guidelines for the CV cutdown in children.
Résultats
METHODS
PatientsWe prospectively enrolled patients who underwent TICVP implantation between Jan. 1, 2002, and Dec. 31, 2006, at the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Seoul National University Children's Hospital, Seoul, Korea. The inclusion c...