2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.main.2015.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arthrodesis of thumb interphalangeal and finger distal interphalangeal joints using the intramedullary X-Fuse® implant: Retrospective analysis of 38 cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
17
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
17
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A systematic review of 32 studies (1,125 digits) analyzed the three most commonly reported techniques (K-wire, headless compression screw, cerclage wire), finding insufficient evidence to support any particular technique. [2] Rates of union reported for generalized screw arthrodesis are ranging from 80% to 100% within three months postoperatively, [3] showing similar results to other commonly performed techniques such as bioabsorbable rod as intramedullary nail, [4] intramedullary K-wire fixation and interosseous wiring, [8] as well as plate and screw fixation. [5] We were able to demonstrate a 95% primary fusion rate within the same time interval using the nitinol (X-Fuse ® ) system, therefore showing effective comparable results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A systematic review of 32 studies (1,125 digits) analyzed the three most commonly reported techniques (K-wire, headless compression screw, cerclage wire), finding insufficient evidence to support any particular technique. [2] Rates of union reported for generalized screw arthrodesis are ranging from 80% to 100% within three months postoperatively, [3] showing similar results to other commonly performed techniques such as bioabsorbable rod as intramedullary nail, [4] intramedullary K-wire fixation and interosseous wiring, [8] as well as plate and screw fixation. [5] We were able to demonstrate a 95% primary fusion rate within the same time interval using the nitinol (X-Fuse ® ) system, therefore showing effective comparable results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Within our larger patient group, we were also able to demonstrate a lack of further complications, except for two patients with postoperative transient nail disorders and one patient with reversible paresthesia, requiring no further treatment. Ameline et al [8] observed a fusion rate of 94.8% (37/38) during evaluation of fusion position, finding a moderate alteration of less than 10° in arthrodesis position within the immediate postoperative interval without any clinical consequence. Our 95% rate of bony fusion (39/41) shows similar results, proving the nitinol implant to be a safe and effective technique for DIP and IP joint arthrodeses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3 Successful fusion generally improves the function and appearance of the thumb because its mobility has a less important role in the overall function of the thumb compared with the metacarpophalangeal joint. 2 This is commonly performed as an open procedure with a transverse or H-incision.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%