2013
DOI: 10.1111/evj.12112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arthroscopic anatomy of the equine cervical articular process joints

Abstract: This study shows that arthroscopic examination of the APJs of equine cervical vertebra is feasible and can be performed in mature horses. Arthroscopy of the APJs may provide additional diagnostic information compared to conventional diagnostic techniques.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Pepe et al . ). Interpretation of neck radiographs is challenging due to complex anatomy, superimposition of structures and difficulty obtaining orthogonal radiographic views (Dimock and Puchalski ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…; Pepe et al . ). Interpretation of neck radiographs is challenging due to complex anatomy, superimposition of structures and difficulty obtaining orthogonal radiographic views (Dimock and Puchalski ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As found by Pepe et al . (), transcutaneous ultrasound provided a practical method of identifying surgical landmarks. Dissection was centred over the caudodorsal joint margin to avoid the ventral intervertebral foramen and fifth cervical spinal nerve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Neurological assessment in foals differs from that in adult horses and represents a limitation of this study. However, in 2 studies describing arthroscopic surgery of the articular process joints (APJ) in 3 adult clinical cases, neurologic deficits were not noted in the postoperative period . Because of their similar proximity to the spinal cord, the risk of distending APJ and A‐O joints may be comparable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%