PurposeThe long‐term failure rate of the arthroscopic Bankart repair may reach unacceptable values, raising the need to augment this classic procedure. Arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation is the tenodesis of the upper part of the subscapularis tendon to the anterior glenoid rim. The aim of the study was to evaluate the mid‐term clinical and functional outcomes of patients operated with arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation of the classic Bankart repair due to recurrent anterior shoulder instability.MethodsThis is a retrospective single‐centre case series study with prospectively collected data. All patients suffered from recurrent anterior shoulder instability and had glenoid bone loss less than 13.5% of the inferior glenoid diameter (subcritical glenoid bone loss). Patients with greater anterior glenoid bone defect, engaging Hill–Sachs lesions, multidirectional instability or subscapularis insufficiency were excluded. Postoperatively, all patients were evaluated for recurrence and apprehension. The patient's shoulder range of motion and functional scores were recorded.ResultsThe final study cohort included 34 patients with a mean age of 29.3 ± 10.2 years. The mean follow‐up period was 42.4 ± 10.7 months (range, 24–62 months). Two out of 34 patients (5.8%) experienced a re‐dislocation postoperatively, while one additional patient had a subjective feeling of apprehension. External rotation at the last follow‐up was lower compared to preoperative values or the healthy side, but only one patient had restrictions in his sporting activities. The functional scores were significantly increased compared to the preoperative values. Twenty‐two out of 26 patients (84.6%) returned to the same level of sporting activities, and 30/34 patients (88.2%) were highly satisfied with the results.ConclusionArthroscopic subscapularis augmentation of the classic Bankart repair reduces the dislocation recurrence rate and leads to satisfactory clinical and functional mid‐term outcomes in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and less than a subcritical glenoid bone loss.Level of EvidenceLevel IV