2018
DOI: 10.1177/2309499018770897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arthroscopic knotless single-row repair preserving full footprint versus tear completion repair for partial articular-sided rotator cuff tear

Abstract: Footprint-preserving knotless single-row repair obtains similar clinical results compared to tear completion repair in the treatment of articular-sided PTRCTs. Footprint-preserving knotless single-row repair may be a convenient choice for the treatment of articular-sided PTRCTs. Randomized controlled studies are needed to investigate whether the footprint-preserving knotless single-row repair yields better long-term outcomes through the protection of the bursal cuff and restoration of the healthy footprint.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Repair of PTRCTs can either be performed with an in-situ ("trans-cuff") repair technique (leaving the intact cuff portion intact) or with a tear conversion into a full-thickness cuff tear and subsequent repair. Successful functional and structural outcome [23][24][25][26] after repair of Ellman grade 3 tears could be shown with both repair techniques. Interestingly, current literature suggests an evidence for inferior outcomes and higher failure rates after arthroscopic debridement of bursal-sided PTRCTs compared to articular-sided lesions [3] .…”
Section: Surgical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Repair of PTRCTs can either be performed with an in-situ ("trans-cuff") repair technique (leaving the intact cuff portion intact) or with a tear conversion into a full-thickness cuff tear and subsequent repair. Successful functional and structural outcome [23][24][25][26] after repair of Ellman grade 3 tears could be shown with both repair techniques. Interestingly, current literature suggests an evidence for inferior outcomes and higher failure rates after arthroscopic debridement of bursal-sided PTRCTs compared to articular-sided lesions [3] .…”
Section: Surgical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Several surgical techniques of in-situ repair have been described [23][24][25][26][30][31][32] , however, with no superiority of one specific technique to the others (Figure 3). A proposed advantage of transtendinous repair techniques with preservation of the intact rotator cuff tendon integrity on the bursal side is the maintenance of the original footprint and therefore a more anatomic repair.…”
Section: In-situ Repair Versus Tear Completion Into Full-thickness Cumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these 17/20 were retrospective case series including single surgeon data for 1069 shoulders. 2,19,20,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] Mean follow-up was 35 months (range 18-60). Two of these 17 case series compared transtendinous repair with completion repair in a single surgeon series in terms of pain and function; however, each of these papers uses completely different outcome scoring systems, with one employing the CMS and SST, the other using ASES score with a visual analogue score for pain.…”
Section: Case Series and Technical Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rotator cuff tear causes pain and limited motor function of shoulder 1 , 2 . The gold standard for treatment is arthroscopic repair when conventional treatment fails 3 , 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%