2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arthroscopic Latarjet Procedure Combined With Bankart Repair: A Technique Using 2 Cortical Buttons and Specific Glenoid and Coracoid Guides

Abstract: The arthroscopic Latarjet procedure is challenging because it can be difficult to place 2 screws parallel to the glenoid surface and a medial portal (dangerous for the brachial plexus) is mandatory. In addition, precise positioning of the coracoid bone block flush with the joint line and in a subequatorial position as recommended is troublesome without the use of a guiding system because of the arthroscopic lens distortion. To improve the reproducibility of the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure and to minimize t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several types of fixation have been proposed to secure the coracoid process to the glenoid. These include one [17] or two metallic screws [1], bioabsorbable screws [4], metallic plates [14] and more recently one [7] or two cortical buttons [32]. Most studies report the results of one or two metallic screws, as this is how the technique was originally described [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several types of fixation have been proposed to secure the coracoid process to the glenoid. These include one [17] or two metallic screws [1], bioabsorbable screws [4], metallic plates [14] and more recently one [7] or two cortical buttons [32]. Most studies report the results of one or two metallic screws, as this is how the technique was originally described [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44,64 Although several modifications exist including arthroscopic execution, options for bone graft fixation, alternative bone harvesting sites, or use of allografts, both described procedures maintain their distinctive character. 3,4,8,17,26,34,35,41,47,52,[56][57][58][59][60][61][62]66 Although several articles on the clinical outcomes of both procedure types have been published and the superiority of one technique over the other has been a common topic at several shoulder conferences, no randomized comparative trials with a high level of evidence are currently available. 2,40 The goal of this study was to perform a prospective randomized trial comparing both competing techniques to provide more reliable data for discussion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 The failure mechanisms were unique to each fixation technique: specimens fixated with screws underwent graft fracture through the drill holes, and specimens fixated with ENDOBUTTONs underwent failure due to glenoid bone fractures. An advantage of the current suture-button fixation technique is the smaller diameter of the 2 holes drilled in the glenoid in comparison to those previously described by Valenti et al 5 (i.e., 2.8 mm vs. 3.5 mm).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Lafosse et al 2 used 7 portals to perform the first full arthroscopic procedure, including a medial portal for the subscapularis split and introduction of the cannula for coracoid handling and fixation. Boileau reduced the number of portals required to perform the procedure to 6 4 , and Valenti et al 5 described an arthroscopic technique performed with only 4 portals, all lateral to the conjoint tendon. The current technique involves 6 portals that are all lateral to the conjoined tendon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation