2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-018-2991-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arthroscopic meniscal surgery versus conservative management in patients aged 40 years and older: a meta-analysis

Abstract: The efficacy of arthroscopic surgery was not superior to conservative management in this type of patients. Therefore, arthroscopic meniscal surgery should not be recommended as a first choice of treatment for degenerative meniscal tears. In patients over 40 years of age, arthroscopic surgery should be cautiously considered for degenerative meniscal tears and only when there has not been a satisfactory response to conservative management.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The pooled results from 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated no difference in pain or function after APM versus conservative management in patients older than 40 years, although arthroscopic technique varied between studies. 77 Both Lee et al 77 and Monk et al 90 recommended that APM be performed only in patients with a degenerative meniscal tear for whom conservative management had failed. Petersen et al 106 found no difference in outcomes between APM versus nonoperative management for meniscal tears, although patients who crossed over from physical therapy to APM had similar outcomes to patients who initially opted for APM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pooled results from 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated no difference in pain or function after APM versus conservative management in patients older than 40 years, although arthroscopic technique varied between studies. 77 Both Lee et al 77 and Monk et al 90 recommended that APM be performed only in patients with a degenerative meniscal tear for whom conservative management had failed. Petersen et al 106 found no difference in outcomes between APM versus nonoperative management for meniscal tears, although patients who crossed over from physical therapy to APM had similar outcomes to patients who initially opted for APM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,86,108 In patients with concomitant degenerative meniscal tears and osteoarthritis, evidence regarding the efficacy of APM has been conflicting. 43,68,73 Substantial evidence is available demonstrating no difference in clinical outcomes for APM versus conservative management for degenerative meniscal tears 1,70,77,78,106,132 ; however, the available evidence may be biased and of low quality. 58,87 Clinical outcomes tended to improve after APM and reoperation rates were low, although knee osteoarthritis is likely to develop after APM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 21 Nevertheless, the optimal postoperative approach is debated. 22 Some authors investigated home-based rehabilitation programs (HBP) instead of standard inpatient and/or outpatient supervised physical therapy (IOP). In view of the high number of AM procedures performed globally, their societal impact and costs, 23 , 24 and considering that HBP confers a cost reduction compared with IOP, 25 understanding the potential and limitations of HBP-based AM postoperative management would be of substantial relevance for patients, physicians, and health care systems worldwide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such cases, the first line of the treatment option should be conservative management. 19,20 A study conducted on middle-aged patients reported the same benefits of exercise therapy as of surgical intervention in meniscal tears. 21 In early stages of knee osteoarthritis, supervised physiotherapy program and routine follow up can prevent the advancement of osteoarthritis and hence total knee replacement surgeries can be delayed or avoided.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%