“…1,[4][5][6][7][8][9] With the development of techniques and understanding of the pathology, arthroscopic procedures more and more replaced the open approaches. 2,3,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Concerns remain for the potential of iatrogenic damage to the articular surface by the sutures and protruding knots as well as for insufficiency of the suture due to limited tissue quality in terms of pullout and cutting through. This can be addressed and minimized by the use of partially resorbable sutures such as ORTHOCORD (Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany) or complete resorbable sutures such as PDS-II (Ethicon) and the application of the lasso-loop stitch, that has been shown to reduce the risk for cutting through the tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 With the development of techniques and understanding of the pathology, arthroscopic procedures more and more replaced the open approaches. 2 , 3 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 …”
Multidirectional shoulder instability and hyperlaxity can be treated with arthroscopic shoulder stabilization and capsular shift. In these patients, the joint capsule often becomes the weak link in terms of pullout strength and cutting through of the used sutures, which can further be compromised by reduced quality of the capsular tissue. The described delta-loop-stitch combines a loop stitch through the capsule with a 3-point-fixation to the intact labrum thus distributing the load and reducing the risk of failure of the fixation. The suture knots are directed under the joint capsule away from the articulating surfaces to reduce the risk of iatrogenic lesions of the articular cartilage. The circumferential application of the delta-loop-stitch allows a sufficient capsular shift that combines a radial and tangential shift and reduction of the overall joint volume that can be adjusted to the patient's individual situation and the surgeon's preference.
“…1,[4][5][6][7][8][9] With the development of techniques and understanding of the pathology, arthroscopic procedures more and more replaced the open approaches. 2,3,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Concerns remain for the potential of iatrogenic damage to the articular surface by the sutures and protruding knots as well as for insufficiency of the suture due to limited tissue quality in terms of pullout and cutting through. This can be addressed and minimized by the use of partially resorbable sutures such as ORTHOCORD (Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany) or complete resorbable sutures such as PDS-II (Ethicon) and the application of the lasso-loop stitch, that has been shown to reduce the risk for cutting through the tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 With the development of techniques and understanding of the pathology, arthroscopic procedures more and more replaced the open approaches. 2 , 3 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 …”
Multidirectional shoulder instability and hyperlaxity can be treated with arthroscopic shoulder stabilization and capsular shift. In these patients, the joint capsule often becomes the weak link in terms of pullout strength and cutting through of the used sutures, which can further be compromised by reduced quality of the capsular tissue. The described delta-loop-stitch combines a loop stitch through the capsule with a 3-point-fixation to the intact labrum thus distributing the load and reducing the risk of failure of the fixation. The suture knots are directed under the joint capsule away from the articulating surfaces to reduce the risk of iatrogenic lesions of the articular cartilage. The circumferential application of the delta-loop-stitch allows a sufficient capsular shift that combines a radial and tangential shift and reduction of the overall joint volume that can be adjusted to the patient's individual situation and the surgeon's preference.
“…I n their article titled, "Arthroscopic Repair of 270-and 360-Degree Glenoid Labrum Tears: A Systematic Review," Ernat, Yheulon, and Shaha provide us with a heterogeneous look into the currently sparse peerreviewed research on large combined labral tears encompassing either 270 or 360 of the glenoid clock face. 1 Although the authors admittedly acknowledge the heterogeneity and overall lack of research on the topic (one half of the 6 studies reviewed containing less than or equal to 10 patients), they should be commended on their effort to concisely summarize an intrinsically complex topic. In some ways, their manuscript reads as a historical summary on the insights we have gained in treating "panlabral" lesions, starting with Powell's description of this entity in 2004 as a type IX slap tear and Lo and Burkhart's description of triple labral lesions (combined anterior, posterior, superior labral tears).…”
Section: See Related Article On Page 307mentioning
Shoulder instability is common in athletes. Combined labral injuries are also common and appear more frequently in chronic cases, suggesting propagation of smaller tears with each event. Panlabral tears, or 270 tears, represent an extreme form of this phenomenon. Arthroscopy has allowed for improved appreciation of these combined patterns. Although it is essential to fix all labral lesions identified during arthroscopy, it is also crucial to enter surgical cases with a clear diagnosis (i.
“…In the setting of 270 labral tears, the anterior, inferior and posterior aspects of the glenoid labrum are detached from the glenoid, rendering the antero-and posteroinferior regions of the glenohumeral joint unstable. 5,6 Open and arthroscopic techniques have been described to address glenohumeral shoulder instability, both producing positive patient-reported outcomes, low risk of recurrence, and high return-to-activity rates. [6][7][8][9] The modern mainstay of anterior instability treatment involves capsulolabral plication using knotted and/or knotless suture anchors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 Open and arthroscopic techniques have been described to address glenohumeral shoulder instability, both producing positive patient-reported outcomes, low risk of recurrence, and high return-to-activity rates. [6][7][8][9] The modern mainstay of anterior instability treatment involves capsulolabral plication using knotted and/or knotless suture anchors. While knotted all-suture anchors remain widely utilized, recent research has supported the functional equivalence of knotless allsuture anchors which offer the advantage of potentially quicker application, tensionability, with a lower risk of subsequent soft-tissue and cartilage abrasions.…”
Extensive glenoid labral tears, whether the result of repetitive instability or first-time dislocation, compromise the mechanical stability of the glenohumeral joint due to disruption of the anterior, inferior, posterior, and/or superior portions of the labrum. These lesions often result in recurrent multiplanar instability and pain that is nonresponsive to conservative management and difficult to diagnose due to variability in clinical presentation and advanced imaging findings. Arthroscopic repair techniques to address symptomatic shoulder instability have showed positive patient-reported outcomes, low failure rates, and high return-to-sport rates. The evolution of knotless suture anchors offers a fixation method that has proven to be functionally equivalent to knotted suture anchors while avoiding the risks of knotted anchors (knot loosening, knot migration, articular abrasion) and allowing easier placement and decreased operative time. The purpose of this technique is to describe our preferred method to treat a 270 labral tear through arthroscopic knotless anchor repair and demonstrate the expanded application of this technique for extensive glenoid labral pathology.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.