2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.09.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Massive, Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review of Modern Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
44
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…8,9 In the absence of glenohumeral arthritis, superior capsule reconstruction has been proposed for the treatment of massive, irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears; however, this technique has been shown to be limited in restoring sufficient external rotation. 10,11 To circumvent this problem, transfer of the latissimus dorsi tendon has been described for use in this patient population. [12][13][14][15] First described by Gerber et al, 16 latissimus dorsi transfer has shown promising results for massive rotator cuff tears in several studies.…”
Section: See Commentary On Page 95mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 In the absence of glenohumeral arthritis, superior capsule reconstruction has been proposed for the treatment of massive, irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears; however, this technique has been shown to be limited in restoring sufficient external rotation. 10,11 To circumvent this problem, transfer of the latissimus dorsi tendon has been described for use in this patient population. [12][13][14][15] First described by Gerber et al, 16 latissimus dorsi transfer has shown promising results for massive rotator cuff tears in several studies.…”
Section: See Commentary On Page 95mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption has been progressively confirmed by biomechanical and clinical studies. 9,10 Moreover, a recent clinical study showed that SCR, if used as a reinforcement for repairable cuff tears, improves structural integrity at 1 year postoperatively; the authors included medium as well as large tears and used SCR with fascia lata. 11 In our opinion, at least 3 major downsides could be claimed regarding the standard SCR technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will be interesting to see how the encouraging early clinical results associated with superior capsular reconstruction affect surgeons' tendency to approach the contracted or tissue-deficient RC tear with a more technically demanding, alternative joint-preserving surgical tactic. [10][11][12] This will be especially true if larger series involving the LSRS construct are unable to significantly improve clinical outcomes or healing rates beyond what have been previously reported. But for now, a limited repair strategy using an LSRS construct may very well be a reasonable approach to this difficult predicament.…”
Section: Previously Observed Favorable Clinical Outcomes and Rc Repaimentioning
confidence: 98%