Arthroscopic treatment for rotator cuff injury and frozen shoulder with concomitant rotator cuff injury: analysis of efficacy and factors influencing prognosis

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the efficacy of arthroscopic treatment for patients with rotator cuff injuries and frozen shoulder combined with rotator cuff injuries and assess the factors influencing patient prognosis. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 85 patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery at Hanzhong Central Hospital between October 2016 and October 2021, including 42 patients treated for rotator cuff injuries alone (Group A), and 43 patients for frozen shoulder combined with rotator cuff injuries (Group B). Both groups underwent general anesthesia with controlled hypotension during surgery. Treatment outcomes, including shoulder joint functional scores, pain scores, shoulder joint range of motion, and muscle strength were assessed and compared between the two groups before treatment, as well as at 2 weeks and 2 months post-treatment. Quality of life was also evaluated and compared at 2 months post-treatment. Patients were categorized into good and poor prognosis groups based on their outcome, and factors influencing patient prognosis were analyzed. Results: Before treatment, both groups exhibited relatively low shoulder joint function scores and external rotation angles, coupled with higher pain scores; however, these differences were not significant between groups (all P>0.05). The surgery duration for Group B was notably longer than that of Group A (P<0.05). Nevertheless, there was no significant variance in intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). After a 2-week treatment duration, both groups demonstrated a significant improvement in shoulder joint function score, pain score, and shoulder joint range of motion compared to baseline, but with no statistically significant intergroup differences. However, two months after the treatment, patients in Group A exhibited marked improvements in shoulder joint function score, pain score, shoulder joint range of motion, and overall quality of life compared to Group B (all P<0.05). Furthermore, the therapeutic efficacy in Group A was superior to that in Group B at the 2-month follow-up (P<0.05). Age, comorbid diabetes, metabolic disorders such as thyroid dysfunction, and the extent of shoulder cuff injury were identified as independent risk factors influencing prognosis. Conclusion: Arthroscopic treatment is effective for both frozen shoulder combined with rotator cuff injury and rotator cuff injury alone, with better outcomes observed in patients with rotator cuff injury only. This technique warrants further promotion.