Wagner's vaunted model of artistic synthesis persists in scholarly assessments of his work. But at its centre, the composer argued that the media of voice and orchestra do not mix: they retain their identities as separate channels of sound that can neither duplicate nor substitute for one another. Taking as a starting point Wagner's claims for the nonadaptability of media, this article addresses the adaptation of Wagner's music to the modern digital technologies of HD cinema and video game. Drawing on a wide circle of writers, from Schiller and Žižek to Bakhtin, Augé, Baudrillard and second-generation media theorists, it interrogates the concept of 'reality' within live acoustic performance, both historically, as a discursive concept, and technologically, via the sensory realism of digital simulcasting and telepresence. The philosophical opposition of appearance and reality fails when reality is defined by the intimate simulation of a sensory event as it is registered on the body. And by contrasting the traditions of high fidelity in (classical) sound recording with that of rendering sound in cinema, I suggest ways in which unmixable media appear to have an afterlife in modern technologies. This raises questions -in a post-Benjamin, post-McLuhan contextabout our definition of 'liveness', the concept of authenticity within mediatised and acoustic sounds, and our vulnerability to the technological effects of media.Technologies are artificial, but … artificiality is natural to humans. (Walter Ong) 1
Wagner and WirklichkeitThe rhetoric of synthesis is hard to get away from in writings about Wagner. As a principle of logic, its force -derived in part from classical dialectics, a discursive mode -can be read and applied broadly. It has shaped discussion of artistic media, as per Jack Stein's interest in the all-pervasive infinity of the Gesamtkunstwerk, 2 and of sexual difference, as per Jean-Jacques Nattiez's critique of telescoped gender as an aesthetic platform. 3 It has been applied to metaphysics, as per Bryan Magee's reading of Schopenhauer as the lynchpin for Wagner's music-theatre-philosophy triumvirate. 4 And it underpins Adorno's reading of Wagnerian sonority as a concealment (or synthetic unification) of the division of mental and physical labour in the composer's orchestration, aligning it with the commodity: 'sound from which the traces of its production have been removed '. 5 I am most grateful to Justin Williams for offering thoughts on an earlier version of this article. 1