2013
DOI: 10.4137/cin.s11583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Article Commentary: Dealing with Diversity in Computational Cancer Modeling

Abstract: This paper discusses the need for interconnecting computational cancer models from different sources and scales within clinically relevant scenarios to increase the accuracy of the models and speed up their clinical adaptation, validation, and eventual translation. We briefly review current interoperability efforts drawing upon our experiences with the development of in silico models for predictive oncology within a number of European Commission Virtual Physiological Human initiative projects on cancer. A clin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Innovative computational modeling and simulation, in addition to appropriately designed biological experiments can facilitate a powerful tool to refine highthroughput biological data, hypotheses and more accurate predictions (Macklin and Lowengrub, 2007;Kam et al, 2012;Edelman et al, 2010;Deisboeck et al, 2011;Johnson et al, 2013). These models can be formulated from the concept of biological spatial spaces: atomic, molecular, microscopic, and macroscopic (Anderson et al, 2011).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innovative computational modeling and simulation, in addition to appropriately designed biological experiments can facilitate a powerful tool to refine highthroughput biological data, hypotheses and more accurate predictions (Macklin and Lowengrub, 2007;Kam et al, 2012;Edelman et al, 2010;Deisboeck et al, 2011;Johnson et al, 2013). These models can be formulated from the concept of biological spatial spaces: atomic, molecular, microscopic, and macroscopic (Anderson et al, 2011).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current computational cancer modeling approaches can be divided into three categories: discrete, continuum, and hybrid, i.e., the combination of both (interested readers should refer to [4-9] for in depth discussions on this topic). Briefly, discrete models employ experimentally-derived, computationally-coded rules to define the step-wise or discrete interactions between individual cells and provide insight on tumor microstructure, cell proliferation and death rates, and cell densities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oncosimulator models also consider multiple scales in aggregate, covering molecular scale interactions and the clinical perspective using patient histories, description of which cannot be integrated into either CellML or SBML models. Further arguments are described in our 2013 Cancer Informatics commentary [10].…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…TumorML true, false also uses a domain-specific taxonomy of models relating to TUMOR that were designed as part of the database schema, summarized in Table 1, where the schema does not strictly enforce the enumerations, but also allows free text strings to be used. A relevant discussion on the different and diverse types of cancer models has been published by the authors in [10]. A list of <reference> elements describe bibliographic references of models and related components of model descriptions to attribute work done elsewhere that the model description is based on.…”
Section: Headermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation