2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-018-3057-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Articular cartilage regeneration and tissue engineering models: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 194 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After acute articular surface fracture, the defect of bone and cartilage is filled with fibrin clot. The defect area of the cartilage surface is in excess of 4 to 16 mm 2 , which is usually not the result of self‐repair. For this kind of disease, the removal of free bone fragments is mainly used in.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After acute articular surface fracture, the defect of bone and cartilage is filled with fibrin clot. The defect area of the cartilage surface is in excess of 4 to 16 mm 2 , which is usually not the result of self‐repair. For this kind of disease, the removal of free bone fragments is mainly used in.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…60,70,86,161,162 As such, a systematic review by Farr et al concluded that for patients with symptomatic chondral injury, numerous techniques are available to relieve pain and improve function but until data from rigorous clinical trials are available, individual treatment decisions must still be guided by expert extrapolation of available literature using historically sound principles. 70 The authors of the present review article suggest that the peer-reviewed literature in conjunction with sound principles and basic science and preclinical data support the following guidance for clinical application to optimizing outcomes 3,18,28,61,74,117,142,[163][164][165][166][167][168][169][170][171][172] :…”
Section: Basic Science Of Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Tremendous effort has been focused on this critical unmet need in orthopedics and significant progress has been made in laboratory and preclinical studies using cell-based, tissue engineering, growth factordriven, gene therapy, and bioprinting strategies. 5,15,49,[142][143][144][145][146][147][148][149][150][151][152][153][154][155][156] Yet, to date, there are no successful cartilage regeneration techniques available for use in humans. 18 The scientific, regulatory, financial, and clinical requirements for use of cartilage regeneration techniques in patients are extremely challenging, such that near-term solutions cannot be expected.…”
Section: Cartilage Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stem cell-based approach and chondrocyte-based approach were common choices for cartilage regenerations. The major advantage of using stem cells is that autologous transplantation can be implemented (Walter et al, 2019). Unlike chondrocytes, autologous stem cells, such as BMSCs or ADSCs, are rich in source.…”
Section: Cells For Craniofacial Cartilage Te In Am Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%