2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-1882-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Articular-sided rotator cuff tears: which is the best repair? A three-year prospective randomised controlled trial

Abstract: Purpose To compare two groups of patients who underwent two different arthroscopic procedures for repair of articularsided partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCTs). Materials this is a comparative prospective study of two methods for repair of partial cuff tears Thirty-two patients underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a transtendon technique (group 1); 28 underwent arthroscopic full-thickness conversion and repair of the lesion (group 2). ROM measures, clinical findings, MRI features (tendon he… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
79
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, when the lesion is smaller than one centimetre, such a procedure may weaken the bone and compromise the site where the anchors have to be implanted. The strength of the repair depends on the state of the tendon-bone interface [18]. Many factors may compromise the healing process at the tendon-bone interface [19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, when the lesion is smaller than one centimetre, such a procedure may weaken the bone and compromise the site where the anchors have to be implanted. The strength of the repair depends on the state of the tendon-bone interface [18]. Many factors may compromise the healing process at the tendon-bone interface [19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repair of PTRCTs can either be performed with an in-situ ("trans-cuff") repair technique (leaving the intact cuff portion intact) or with a tear conversion into a full-thickness cuff tear and subsequent repair. Successful functional and structural outcome [23][24][25][26] after repair of Ellman grade 3 tears could be shown with both repair techniques. Interestingly, current literature suggests an evidence for inferior outcomes and higher failure rates after arthroscopic debridement of bursal-sided PTRCTs compared to articular-sided lesions [3] .…”
Section: Surgical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Several surgical techniques of in-situ repair have been described [23][24][25][26][30][31][32] , however, with no superiority of one specific technique to the others (Figure 3). A proposed advantage of transtendinous repair techniques with preservation of the intact rotator cuff tendon integrity on the bursal side is the maintenance of the original footprint and therefore a more anatomic repair.…”
Section: In-situ Repair Versus Tear Completion Into Full-thickness Cumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, two randomized clinical studies failed to show a difference in clinical outcome scores or re-tear rates between the two groups [58,59]. Both studies did show significant improvements in VAS, ASES, and Constant scores as well as similarly low re-tear rates on follow-up MRIs in both groups.…”
Section: Partial-thickness Rotator Cuff Tearsmentioning
confidence: 98%