2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Articulating mobile gendered landscapes: Thinking with care cultures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Chen et al (2022) explore how care for people with intellectual disabilities in institutionalized spaces is framed and enacted through various culture-specific paradigms that while attentive and respectful, are also paradoxically disabling (such as the charity paradigm or fictive kinships of Confucian care). In a good example of how care can be simultaneously immediately proximate and distal (Milligan and Wiles, 2010), Ivanova (2022) employs ethnographic work with Bulgarian temporary migrant carers working in Italy who ‘care in less-than-caring landscapes’ to understand the complex ways they make sense of their roles and their caring practices, both as mothers who are physically distanced from their children so as to provide resources for them, and as paid carers to individual older people in a globally situated market for care. Yu and Rosenberg (2022) likewise interrogate assumptions about individual choice and independence in ageing in place, arguing these are often unhelpful in other cultural contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Chen et al (2022) explore how care for people with intellectual disabilities in institutionalized spaces is framed and enacted through various culture-specific paradigms that while attentive and respectful, are also paradoxically disabling (such as the charity paradigm or fictive kinships of Confucian care). In a good example of how care can be simultaneously immediately proximate and distal (Milligan and Wiles, 2010), Ivanova (2022) employs ethnographic work with Bulgarian temporary migrant carers working in Italy who ‘care in less-than-caring landscapes’ to understand the complex ways they make sense of their roles and their caring practices, both as mothers who are physically distanced from their children so as to provide resources for them, and as paid carers to individual older people in a globally situated market for care. Yu and Rosenberg (2022) likewise interrogate assumptions about individual choice and independence in ageing in place, arguing these are often unhelpful in other cultural contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%