2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15558-1_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Articulation-Invariant Representation of Non-planar Shapes

Abstract: Abstract. Given a set of points corresponding to a 2D projection of a non-planar shape, we would like to obtain a representation invariant to articulations (under no self-occlusions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
136
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
136
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The shape descriptors were: curvature (as an example descriptor of one dimension for each point), BAS [2] (four dimensiones) and the shape contexts (SC) [5,6] (60 dimensions). The results achieved with these descriptors, and in particular the ones with the shape contexts, can be applied to other ones of similar characteristics from the bibliography [3,4,[6][7][8]. We also used a synthetic corpus of sequences of several dimensions (1, 5, 10, 20 and 60).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The shape descriptors were: curvature (as an example descriptor of one dimension for each point), BAS [2] (four dimensiones) and the shape contexts (SC) [5,6] (60 dimensions). The results achieved with these descriptors, and in particular the ones with the shape contexts, can be applied to other ones of similar characteristics from the bibliography [3,4,[6][7][8]. We also used a synthetic corpus of sequences of several dimensions (1, 5, 10, 20 and 60).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the methods to solve this problem the ones related to Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) [1] and descriptors of the contour with sequences of components of several dimensions have had a significant presence [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. In general, these shape descriptors aim to have information from all of the contour with respect to each point, that is the reason for their large size (see Figure 1 for an example of the shape descriptor used in [6]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that we do not require to have a complete object segmented and thus will also address partial shape matching. Note also that most of the well established shape-based approaches do not consider deformations and articulated movements, while we do [16,19]. Contrarily to classical skeletal-based representations, ours is not overly sensitive to small boundary deformations and furthermore gives high response in those regions where the object has high curvature with large boundary support and in the vicinity of joints (between well-delineated parts, such as the limbs of an animal).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Also, rather than comparing our method only with readily available texture-based well-known methods, such as SIFT and SURF which are well suited to deal with large databases of images, we ought to also compare with more closely related methods such as the Inner Distance Shape Context method -one of the few other published method which is capable to explicitly deal with planar articulations [16] -and other recent related methods (e.g. [19,55,46]); but notice that it is unclear how these other shape-based techniques scale with a database size (as they are often only tested on relatively small datasets of at most a few hundred targets).…”
Section: Fig 27mentioning
confidence: 99%