Articulations toward a crip HCI

Williams, Anna; Ringland, Kathryn E.; Gibson, Amelia N.; Mandala, Mahender; Maibaum, Arne; Guerreiro, Tiago

doi:10.1145/3458453

Cited by 22 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This practice brings feminist science and technology studies into conversation with disability justice to name "practices of critique, alteration, and reinvention" that transform social relations and harness frictive political action (Hamraie & Fritsch, 2019, p. 1). My thinking is also informed through articulations of crip HCI (Williams et al, 2021), which draws from disability justice and critical disability scholarship to acknowledge a more pluralistic conceptualization of cripistemological design, computing, and creation. Finally, I present neuroqueer technoscience as an expansion of crip technoscience that reveals how frictive material and structural change can facilitate new possibilities for political-cultural neuroqueer subjectivity in mediated spaces.…”

Section: Introduction: Locating a Neuroqueer Technosciencementioning

confidence: 99%

Imagining a Neuroqueer Technoscience

Rauchberg

2022

SSJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The rise of mobile communication applications and technologies presents promising therapeutic and accessibility-related interventions for neurodivergent users. However, top-down approaches in human-computer interaction (HCI) research often prioritize the needs and goals of allistic and neurotypical researchers and secondary stakeholders in media creation. Furthermore, media technologies are created with a one-size-fits-all approach, with the intent of rehabilitating or curing neurodivergent ways of being. This article imagines neuroqueer technoscience as an extension of crip technoscience that amplifies new styles of relationality, self-expression, and communication practices within the development of information and communication technologies (ICTs). Using an interdisciplinary framework informed by crip technoscience and human-computer interaction research, the author presents three tenets for mediating neuroqueer subjectivities.

show abstract

Section: Introduction: Locating a Neuroqueer Technosciencementioning

confidence: 99%

Imagining a Neuroqueer Technoscience

Rauchberg

2022

SSJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Towards a Research Agenda for Geopolitical Tensions in HCI

Abdelnour Nocera,

Clemmensen,

van Biljon

et al. 2024

Interacting With Computers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There are major geopolitical challenges for human-computer interaction (HCI): there may be little or no global HCI knowledge with a shared approach and identity; Western HCI theory and methods may not be adequate for regional or local models of education and practice; and the global organization of HCI research communities may be biased. This article explores geopolitical tensions in HCI research and practice fields. In particular, it offers an action-oriented framework to support systematic analysis and comparison of what HCI, as a field of knowledge and practice, is in different geopolitical contexts. We use activity theory combined with the knowledge mobilization framework to develop an actionable comparative analysis framework of geopolitical HCI challenges. The proposed framework is demonstrated by using it to analyse geopolitical HCI tensions in three case studies: the first one is focused on cultural and ideological issues surrounding the introduction of global HCI curricula in South Africa; the second one documents how local design practices in China are undermined by foreign narratives of the value of global HCI knowledge; and the third one offers an account of how global HCI could stimulate subversive local action in Colombia. The discussion takes up HCI tensions within and across countries, proposes a research agenda for geopolitical HCI research and presents theoretical contributions to activity theory and knowledge mobilization approaches. The conclusion answers research questions derived from the above challenges and summarizes how our framework and research agenda can be used to identify and assess geopolitical tensions in HCI ensuring diversity and pluralism in the field.

show abstract