Articulatory effects on perceptions of men’s status and attractiveness

Abstract

Research on heterosexual mating has demonstrated that acoustic parameters (e.g., pitch) of men’s voices influence their attractiveness to women and appearance of status and formidability to other men. However, little is known about how men’s tendency to clearly articulate their speech influences these important social perceptions. In the current study, we used a repeated-measures design to investigate how men’s articulatory clarity or conformity influenced women’s (N = 45) evaluations of men’s attractiveness for both short- and long-term relationships, and men's (N = 46) evaluations of physical formidability and prestige. Results largely supported our hypotheses: men who enunciated phonemes more distinctly were more attractive to women for long-term relationships than short-term relationships and were perceived by other men to have higher prestige than physical dominance. These findings suggest that aspects of articulatory behavior that influence perceptions of prestige and long-term mating attractiveness may indicate an early social history characterized by high socioeconomic status, likely owing to crystallization of articulatory patterns during the critical period of language development. These articulatory patterns may also be honest signals of condition or disposition owing to the nature of complex, multicomponent traits, which deserve further empirical attention.

Effects of Voice Pitch on Social Perceptions Vary With Relational Mobility and Homicide Rate

“…Although the current results shed light on putative psychological adaptations that adjust status and other social assessments across socioenvironmental contexts, our study has limitations. The use of standardized English speech samples enhances internal validity but may limit external validity because of linguistic differences or unaccounted articulatory variations across regions (Karthikeyan et al, 2023). Furthermore, socioecological variables were not measured directly from participants, and socioecological variables assessed at the national level may not accurately represent communities in which data were collected, although relational mobility assessed at the local level produced similar results for male voices (Table S1).…”