Artifacts for Article

Luan, Sifei; Yang, Di; Barnaby, Celeste; Sen, Koushik; Chandra, Satish

doi:10.1145/3361527

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Ongoing work that tackles the automatic capturing and modeling of vp-s in similar kinds of code structure [89,66] or a recommendation approach based on our framework for modeling vp-s with variants, comparable to the code recommendation approaches for reuse [61], could also be considered to be coupled to the proposed contribution, so to reduce the burden of manual variability capturing and modeling and only on relevant or intricate variations points. In addition, we are working on the interoperability of our tool with other variability management tools, such as pure::variants, by using the variability exchange language (VEL) [69], as a coming standard for exchanging variability information between variability management tools.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A framework for managing the imperfect modularity of variability implementations

Tërnava

Collet

2020

Journal of Computer Languages

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In many industrial settings, the common and varying features of related software-intensive systems, as their reusable units, are likely to be implemented by a combined set of traditional techniques. Features do not align perfectly well with the used language constructs, e.g., classes, thus hindering the management of implemented variability. Herein, we provide a detailed framework to capture, model, and trace this imperfectly modular variability in terms of variation points with variants. We describe an implementation of this framework, as a domain-specific language, and report on its application on four subject systems and usage for variability management, showing its feasibility. Figure 1: An excerpt of the feature model (FM) of JavaGeom variability-rich system (The FM is created using the FeatureIDE tool [62]).

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%