1975
DOI: 10.1537/ase1911.83.137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artifacts of the Yamashita-cho Cave Site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Yamashita-cho Cave I materials derive from two excavations, the first in 1962 (Takamiya, 1967(Takamiya, , 1968 and the second in [1968][1969]. The stratigraphic context is outlined in Takamiya et al (1975a), and the deer fossils are described in Takai (1975).…”
Section: Fluorine Dating Of the Yamashita-cho Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Yamashita-cho Cave I materials derive from two excavations, the first in 1962 (Takamiya, 1967(Takamiya, , 1968 and the second in [1968][1969]. The stratigraphic context is outlined in Takamiya et al (1975a), and the deer fossils are described in Takai (1975).…”
Section: Fluorine Dating Of the Yamashita-cho Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This contradicts Takamiya et al (1975a) (summarized after the second excavation in [1968][1969] who state that most of the deer fossils derive from layer VI. According to Takamiya (1967Takamiya ( , 1968, there appears to have been some initial uncertainty in stratigraphy, with the earlier reports (of the first excavation conducted in 1962) recognizing only five layers. We suspect that much of Takai's (1975) layer "5" deer fossils actually came from layer VI of the revised stratigraphy (Takamiya, 1968;Takamiya et al, 1975a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, some materials from Tokunoshima Island in the northern part of the Ryukyus also produced materials assigned to the Palaeolithic (Yotsumoto and Ito, 2002). However, the Okinawa Islands and southern regions have not produced significant examples of Palaeolithic stone tool technology, the controversial exceptions being from Yamashita-cho Cave 1 (Takamiya et al, 1975b;Oda, 2003) and Kadabaru Cave (Oda, 2007). The scattered stone tools in the Ryukyu Islands are in striking contrast to the abundance of human fossils assigned to Pleistocene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earliest site on the Ryukyus is Yamashita-cho Cave I on Okinawa Island. Partial infant leg bones were found in 36,500-year-old sediments, accompanied by stone cobbles and possible food remains such as fish bones and marine shells, although they were not keenly studied [17,18,22]. About 30,000-year-old flakes and cobbles were found on several other islands throughout the Ryukyus (Table 1) [1,4].…”
Section: Late Pleistocene Migration To the Ryukyus Viewed From The Cu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Okinawa Islands, three sandstone cobbles were discovered with partial infant human bones at the Yamashita-cho Cave I site, which is 36,500 years old, based on 14 C dating of charcoal [17,18,27]. These cobbles were reported to be throwing stone balls [18], but Oda [31] claims they were grinding stones or hammer stones that might share a cultural relationship with those found at Garazo in Tokunoshima and several sites in Tanegashima. Following these cobbles, a culture unique to the Ryukyus possibly developed on Okinawa Island.…”
Section: Late Pleistocene Migration To the Ryukyus Viewed From The Cu...mentioning
confidence: 99%