1998
DOI: 10.2514/2.7545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial Dissipation Schemes for Viscous Airfoil Computations

Abstract: where there is a pressure peak as seen in the theoretical model of the roller-type structure and recent experimental measurements. 12 This supports the idea that the excitation causes a pressure peak in the mixing layer that induces the roller-type structure.Instantaneous and average images were also taken for a Mach 2 jet (M c D 0:85) with no excitation and with laser excitation (Figs. 4d and 4e) having a delay time of 100 ¹s between the excitation and imaging pulses. For the unforced case, the decrease in m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These gures show that overall the errors obtained using CUSP are similar in magnitude to those obtained using matrix dissipation.Use of the JST scheme leads to much larger errors. 3 Matrix dissipation is slightly more accurate in predicting the lift coef cient and the friction drag coef cient. The CUSP scheme produces more accurate pressure drag values for the transonic cases.…”
Section: Shock Capturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These gures show that overall the errors obtained using CUSP are similar in magnitude to those obtained using matrix dissipation.Use of the JST scheme leads to much larger errors. 3 Matrix dissipation is slightly more accurate in predicting the lift coef cient and the friction drag coef cient. The CUSP scheme produces more accurate pressure drag values for the transonic cases.…”
Section: Shock Capturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The streamwise momentum equation is typically most revealing. 3 Figure 1 shows the x-momentum ux balance for case 1 computed on grid C with the matrix and CUSP schemes. The user-selectedparameters for matrix dissipation were set to j 2 = 0 and j 4 = 0.02 with V n = V l = 0.…”
Section: Dissipation In Boundary Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%