“…The first scenario, where these systems can be safely operated, will probably be the operating room, where constant supervision by an anesthesiologist provides an important safety net; - Deeper understanding of fluid dynamics and their translation to ever-more-complex computational models, meant for better accuracy and validity of both controllers and in silico testing platforms [ 18 , 79 , 80 ];
- Introduction of new modalities of artificial intelligence, such as reinforcement learning [ 81 , 82 ] and other deep-learning modalities. While there’s increasing use of deep-learning for anesthesia and critical care-related applications [ 83 , 84 ], we have not identified detailed reports on deep-learning-based systems matching our inclusion criteria, meaning we have not identified a system that incorporates deep-learning-based capabilities into a CL system (or, for that matter, a DS system with a feedback loop of repeat evaluations);
- Continuing formation of a regulatory pipeline dedicated to autonomous and semi-autonomous controlled systems;
- Increased use of non-invasive sensors in closed-loop fluid administration systems, as their reliability will gradually increase [ 43 , 85 ], as well as artificial intelligence-based advanced sensing modalities (specifically, feature extraction), such as arterial waveform feature analysis [ 77 , 78 ], aimed at providing personalized resuscitation goals;
- Gradual increase in the degree of automation—from a regulatory standpoint, decision support systems are generally considered safer and easier to approve. However, they do not offer the same mental offloading and adherence as a closed-loop or even a provider-in-loop system can potentially offer.
…”