2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2021.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial Intelligence and Cellular Segmentation in Tissue Microscopy Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These methods have been developed and validated in LN image data sets TII and identification of prognostic features has been historically impeded by the complexities of analyzing immunofluorescence data from chronically inflamed kidneys, including tissue autofluorescence due to scarring, antibody cross-reactivity, and patient heterogeneity. Artificial intelligence algorithms have led to significant progress in automated detection and analysis of cells in confocal images (19)(20)(21)(22). These approaches have been used suc-…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods have been developed and validated in LN image data sets TII and identification of prognostic features has been historically impeded by the complexities of analyzing immunofluorescence data from chronically inflamed kidneys, including tissue autofluorescence due to scarring, antibody cross-reactivity, and patient heterogeneity. Artificial intelligence algorithms have led to significant progress in automated detection and analysis of cells in confocal images (19)(20)(21)(22). These approaches have been used suc-…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The evolution of AI in pathology is illuminated by earlier but analogous trends in radiology. 4 Analogies with the use of AI in reduction of interobserver variability are considered, 5 as are current strategies for reducing the need for massive annotation in machine learning through either the use of existing supervised frameworks or by exploiting hybrid models using unsupervised learning, generative models, and/or synthetic data. 6 Because of the rapid emergence of generative algorithms, a separate Review is included on generative deep learning in the pathology environment.…”
Section: Q11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to accurately locate, classify, and segment cells within microscopy images is fundamental for bioimaging applications in both basic and translational biomedical research, as it enables the study of cell spatial relationships and morphologies as they pertain to physiology, drug response, and disease ( 1 , 2 ). Automating these otherwise time-consuming and expert-dependent tasks has been an active area of research and development ( 3 , 4 ), particularly since the advent of convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which have attained substantially higher accuracies than previous “hand-crafted,” feature-engineered methods ( 5 ). Fluorescence tissue imaging presents a number of challenges that can reduce the accuracy of CNNs in cell segmentation and classification, including auto-fluorescence, dense clustering, and variation in cell size, shape, and density among different cell types ( 6 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluorescence tissue imaging presents a number of challenges that can reduce the accuracy of CNNs in cell segmentation and classification, including auto-fluorescence, dense clustering, and variation in cell size, shape, and density among different cell types ( 6 ). Much of the effort in overcoming these challenges has been focused on improving CNN architectures or creating large datasets for pretraining CNNs so that they attain high accuracies with limited training examples ( 4 , 6–8 ). However, improvements may also be made by leveraging advances in microscope technology for use in combination with CNNs or other deep-learning architectures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%