Artificial Intelligence and Teachers’ New Ethical Obligations

Abstract


 
 
 Largely thought to be immune from automation, the teaching profession is now being challenged on multiple fronts by new digital infrastructures and smart software that automate pedagogical decision-making and supporting teaching practises. To better understand this emerging and ethically fraught intensification of technologies in today’s classrooms, we asked, “what new ethical obligations are teachers facing as a result of AI technology adoption in schools?” We began by defining AI, then turned to posthumanism to grapple with how networked, AI-enhanced digital technologies extend and intermesh with human beings cognitively, affectively, morally, corporeally, spatially, temporally, socially and politically. We catalogued Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies that have been deployed in some of today’s K-12 classrooms (AIEDK-12)s and developed a topology of AIEDK-12 technologies based on (1) teachers’ professional activities being supported by AI, (2) AI being used by and for learners to facilitate their learning and development; (3) additions to K-12 curricula about AI; and (4) AI-based technologies being used by schools, districts and ministries of education to inform decisions that affect teachers. We then consider how a posthumanist investigative approach to disclosive ethics —”interviewing objects”— can shed new light on the implications of widespread deployment of AIEdK12 on teachers’ work. We interviewed three AI-based educational applications, recasting teachers and students as involved and evolving human-AI hybrids. In the process, we uncovered some of the new complications and ethical conundrums being introduced to teachers’ professional practises.
 
 

Rethinking the contributions of young people with learning disabilities to iPad storymaking: a new model of distributed authorship

“…On the other hand, the attribution of authorship for a non-intentional contribution could be accused of obscuring the degree of parental editorial and creative control (or the degree of authorial coercion, which is implicit within forms of AI such as word prediction), thus imputing to the child a perspective which is unwarranted. This echoes posthuman debates about the issue of authorship attribution where human and technology are deeply entangled (Adams et al, 2022). In this study, it remained a constant epistemological challenge to navigate between the risk of overinterpreting embodied and physiological responses to an event on the one hand and the risk of committing 'testimonial injustice' (Fricker, 2007, p.1) by dismissing the voice of those who do not express themselves verbally on the other hand.…”

Generative AI, Research Ethics, and Higher Education Research: Insights from a Scientometric Analysis

“…While many researchers have embraced the potential of LLMs to enhance the research and writing process, others have voiced concerns regarding ethical dilemmas, such as authorship attribution, potential plagiarism, and the authenticity of content generated by AI [17,18]. These concerns underscore a broader ethical debate about the role and impact of AI in academic research, emphasizing the need to examine how these tools are integrated into scholarly practices carefully [19,20]. The varying reactions highlight a fundamental question: how can the academic community ensure the ethical use of LLMs in a way that enhances research integrity and the advancement of knowledge?…”

Semantris Google Ai-Based Learning to Enhance Students’ Vocabulary Mastery

“…This is not surprising since gamers are often motivated to understand the input provided in the game, so paying attention to the language used in the game will help them advance in the game. The media that can change the learning experience into an interesting and effective learning process is by using educative digital gamesbased Artificial Intelligence (AI) (Adams et al, 2022).…”