2024
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13072076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Predicting the Risks of Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy and Cardiac Transplantation

Chloe Grzyb,
Dongping Du,
Nandini Nair

Abstract: Background: The use of AI-driven technologies in probing big data to generate better risk prediction models has been an ongoing and expanding area of investigation. The AI-driven models may perform better as compared to linear models; however, more investigations are needed in this area to refine their predictability and applicability to the field of durable MCS and cardiac transplantation. Methods: A literature review was carried out using Google Scholar/PubMed from 2000 to 2023. Results: This review defines … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 66 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a valuable tool in cardiovascular medicine, particularly in predicting outcomes for patients undergoing durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and heart transplantation (HT) for end-stage heart failure [73]. The integration and analysis of complex clinical data using AI have shown promise in improving risk prediction and optimizing patient selection for these therapies [74], [75], [76], [77], [78].…”
Section: Mechanical Circulatory Support (Mcs) Device Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a valuable tool in cardiovascular medicine, particularly in predicting outcomes for patients undergoing durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and heart transplantation (HT) for end-stage heart failure [73]. The integration and analysis of complex clinical data using AI have shown promise in improving risk prediction and optimizing patient selection for these therapies [74], [75], [76], [77], [78].…”
Section: Mechanical Circulatory Support (Mcs) Device Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%