Artificial intelligence‐based analyses of varus leg alignment and after high tibial osteotomy show high accuracy and reproducibility

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based software for fully automated analysis of leg alignment pre- and postoperatively after high tibial osteotomy (HTO) on long-leg radiographs (LLRs). Methods Long-leg radiographs of 95 patients with varus malalignment that underwent medial open-wedge HTO were analyzed pre- and postoperatively. Three investigators and an AI software using deep learning algorithms (LAMA™, ImageBiopsy Lab, Vienna, Austria) evaluated the hip–knee–ankle angle (HKA), mechanical axis deviation (MAD), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA). All measurements were performed twice and the performance of the AI software was compared with individual human readers using a Bayesian mixed model. In addition, the inter-observer intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for inter-observer reliability was evaluated by comparing measurements from manual readers. The intra-reader variability for manual measurements and the AI-based software was evaluated using the intra-observer ICC. Results Initial varus malalignment was corrected to slight valgus alignment after HTO. Measured by the AI algorithm and manually HKA (5.36° ± 3.03° and 5.47° ± 2.90° to − 0.70 ± 2.34 and − 0.54 ± 2.31), MAD (19.38 mm ± 11.39 mm and 20.17 mm ± 10.99 mm to − 2.68 ± 8.75 and − 2.10 ± 8.61) and MPTA (86.29° ± 2.42° and 86.08° ± 2.34° to 91.6 ± 3.0 and 91.81 ± 2.54) changed significantly from pre- to postoperative, while JLCA and mLDFA were not altered. The fully automated AI-based analyses showed no significant differences for all measurements compared with manual reads neither in native preoperative radiographs nor postoperatively after HTO. Mean absolute differences between the AI-based software and mean manual observer measurements were 0.5° or less for all measurements. Inter-observer ICCs for manual measurements were good to excellent for all measurements, except for JLCA, which showed moderate inter-observer ICCs. Intra-observer ICCs for manual measurements were excellent for all measurements, except for JLCA and for MPTA postoperatively. For the AI-aided analyses, repeated measurements showed entirely consistent results for all measurements with an intra-observer ICC of 1.0. Conclusions The AI-based software can provide fully automated analyses of native long-leg radiographs in patients with varus malalignment and after HTO with great accuracy and reproducibility and could support clinical workflows. Level of evidence Diagnostic study, Level III.

Neutral to slightly undercorrected mechanical leg alignment provides superior long‐term results in patients undergoing matrix‐associated autologous chondrocyte implantation

“…This shift is primarily driven by scientific evidence but may also be the result of surgical progress [10,12]. More stable fixation methods, open wedge osteotomies with gap measurements and accurate digital preoperative planning allow even small corrections of minor deformities to be performed with precision [5,28].…”

A practical guide to the development and deployment of deep learning models for the orthopaedic surgeon: Part III, focus on registry creation, diagnosis, and data privacy

“…Besides extracting structured information from raw clinical data to build data registries, deep learning models have also been developed for diagnosis and clinical decision-making in orthopaedics [10,12,33,34,37]. While there are many examples of studies that utilize standard machine learning models like Extreme Gradient Boosting (a tabular data-based algorithm that does not utilize imaging or deep learning) to create models to aid in diagnosis and clinical decision-making [11,23,24], the focus here remains on those that utilize deep learning and imaging for diagnosis-related tasks.…”

Orthopaedic surgeons display a positive outlook towards artificial intelligence: A survey among members of the AGA Society for Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery

“…While the complexity and rapidness in the development of AI technologies may represent a barrier for full‐time clinicians aiming to reach and maintain an up‐to‐date technical understanding, several applications of AI specific to orthopaedic surgery have been developed, including preoperative risk stratification [ 19 , 31 , 35 ], outcome prediction [ 27 ], diagnosis and preoperative planning [ 45 , 46 , 49 ], augmentation of postoperative rehabilitation [ 4 , 11 ], automated administration [ 26 , 51 ] and patient information [ 18 ].…”