2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.aiig.2022.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial intelligence-based anomaly detection of the Assen iron deposit in South Africa using remote sensing data from the Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). Within MPM, and for strictly the purpose of data analysis, machine learning is used to primarily: (1) identify mineralization-related anomalies through unsupervised learning (e.g., Nwaila et al, 2022;Zhang et al, 2022b); (2) predict targets that are similar to known occurrences through supervised learning (e.g., Zuo & Carranza, 2011;Zhang et al, 2021;Senanayake et al, 2023); and (3) predict targets using reinforcement learning (e.g., Shi et al, 2023). Outside of data analysis, machine learning is also beginning to be used in: (1) data generation (e.g., Zhang et al, 2022b;Bourdeau et al, 2023); (2) data processing (e.g., Song et al, 2020;Nwaila et al, 2023;Zhang et al, 2023); and (3) simulations (e.g., Song et al, 2021).…”
Section: Review Of Data-driven Mpm Workflowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). Within MPM, and for strictly the purpose of data analysis, machine learning is used to primarily: (1) identify mineralization-related anomalies through unsupervised learning (e.g., Nwaila et al, 2022;Zhang et al, 2022b); (2) predict targets that are similar to known occurrences through supervised learning (e.g., Zuo & Carranza, 2011;Zhang et al, 2021;Senanayake et al, 2023); and (3) predict targets using reinforcement learning (e.g., Shi et al, 2023). Outside of data analysis, machine learning is also beginning to be used in: (1) data generation (e.g., Zhang et al, 2022b;Bourdeau et al, 2023); (2) data processing (e.g., Song et al, 2020;Nwaila et al, 2023;Zhang et al, 2023); and (3) simulations (e.g., Song et al, 2021).…”
Section: Review Of Data-driven Mpm Workflowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second major source of variability in data-driven workflows is the construction of covariates, which are referred to as Ôevidence layersÕ in the geospatial realm. Covariate data can range from mono-disciplinary, such as geochemical (e.g., Zhang et al, 2022b) or spectral (e.g., Nwaila et al, 2022), up to sizable combinations of qualitative and quantitative geoscientific data (e.g., Lawley et al, 2022). The variability encountered in covariate construction falls into two major categories: (1) the number of covariates; and (2) their quality.…”
Section: Review Of Data-driven Mpm Workflowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a blue band (band 1: 0.433-0.453 µm) and a cirrus band (band 9: 1.360-1.390 µm) are added, which can be applied to coastal observation and cloud detection, respectively. Furthermore, all the OLI and TIRS spectral bands are stored as geolocated 16-bit digital numbers in the same Level 1 terrain corrected (L1T) file, which facilitates the differentiating of materials more efficiently than ETM+ imagery stored as 8-bit numbers [47,48]. Although multispectral sensors such as TM, ETM+, and OLI render insufficient spectral resolution for discriminating specific minerals, achieving effective processing, or running data analysis, they yield useful image products for regional exploration and discovery when they are combined with a good understanding of the associated landforms [46].…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ML algorithms have been employed in the study and exploration of mineral deposits to identify and model patterns and regularities that are unobvious (Srinivasan & Fisher, 1995;Galetakis et al, 2022;Mery & Marcotte, 2022). This has been demonstrated in studies such as applying ML algorithms to satellite imagery to locate and study mineral deposits, and to improve mineral exploration (Maxwell et al, 2018;Cevik et al, 2021;Diaz-Gonzalez et al, 2022;Liu et al, 2022;Nwaila et al, 2022). Particularly related to this study is the use of ML to perform geodomain boundary delineation (Zhang et al, 2023), which is a task that is required in the geostatistical treatment of mapping to resource estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%